Beit Yehonatan attorney responds to Lador letter

By ABE SELIG
February 2, 2010 01:51
1 minute read.
Beit Yehonatan attorney responds to Lador letter

lador court 224 88. (photo credit: Ariel Jerozolimski)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For a symbolic $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Don't show it again

Attorney Ze’ev Sharaf, who represents the residents of the Beit Yehonatan building in the east Jerusalem neighborhood of Silwan, released a response on Monday to a letter sent by State Attorney Moshe Lador to Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat last Thursday, which had called on the mayor to seal the seven-story structure immediately.

According to Sharaf, Lador’s letter to Barkat included “numerous errors” and its timing and subsequent publication over the weekend was “a means of exerting pressure.” Sharaf also expressed his suspicions that “extraneous considerations along with personal and political motives” were behind the letter.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.



Regarding Lador’s “mistakes,” Sharaf pointed out that the state attorney had claimed “numerous orders to seal the building had been issued,” when, according to Sharaf, only one such order had been issued.

Sharaf also noted that Lador had claimed the High Court had issued such orders, when, according to Sharaf, the order to seal Beit Yehonatan had come from “a court that deals with local matters only.”

Additionally, Sharaf questioned Lador’s labeling of the order to seal the building as “long-outstanding” and pointed to the fact that Silwan was an area “filled with numerous and severely outstanding orders for Arab homes that are, by the admission of municipality attorneys, routinely ignored.”


Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town

By SHARON UDASIN