high court 224.88.
(photo credit: Ariel Jerozolimski [file])
The High Court of Justice on Wednesday ruled that an amendment to the Income Tax Act which bestows tax benefits to several communities, not one of which is Arab, is discriminatory and therefore unconstitutional. The decision came after petitions against Amendment 146 were submitted by the human rights groups ACRI and Adalah in 2005.
RELATED:Court rules: schools cannot discriminate against students
The court's decision gave the State the opportunity to amend the act to eliminate discriminatory elements in the context of its 2011-2012 fiscal legislation. The court gave the State two months to initiate the process and ordered it to report its progress by November 30.
The amendment originally bestowed tax exemptions to Israeli communities located on the border with the Gaza Strip, but the list quickly expanded to include additional communities . The petitioners claimed that the provision of significant tax rebates to communities without clear criteria is a violation of the right to equality, and pointed to the fact that not one of the communities enjoying the benefits is Arab.
In the ruling, the court wrote, "The government and the Knesset avoided -
in a systematic and longstanding manner - the formulation of a solution
to the issues outlined in the petitions; this was in direct
contravention of the positions taken by representatives of the Attorney
According to Adalah Attorney Sawsan Zaher: "This ruling is very
important for the advancement of socio-economic equality in Israel. The
decision clearly states that the provision of tax benefits to certain
communities is discriminatory because the cabinet did not consider
principles of equality in formulating the criteria for receipt of these
benefits, specifically to include Arab communities, which suffer from
widespread poverty, especially the Bedouin communities in the Negev.
"This is not the first time that the High Court has ruled against the
discrimination of Arab communities in the allocation of economic
benefits; three years ago, the High Court ruled against the exclusion of
Arab communities in the categorization of communities into national
priority areas (which receive benefits), but the cabinet has refused to
implement the ruling."
According to ACRI Attorney Auni Banna, "Amendment 146 is an attempt to
anchor in law the provision of tax benefits to friends and allies, and
not to those who truly need them. This state of affairs violates the
basic principles of equality and fair administration, acutely harming
the Arab communities whose socio-economic status is the worst among the
communities in Israel. Following a long period in which the High Court
exhibited exceptional patience toward the government, we welcome the
court's decision which elucidates to the cabinet that the amendment to
the act is unconstitutional and it must be amended or cancelled
Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>