Foreign Ministry: Durban II boycott improved outcome

Israel: Accusations and inciement directed against Jewish state in original drafts omitte from Concluding Statement.

May 5, 2009 00:04
1 minute read.
Foreign Ministry: Durban II boycott improved outcome

durban II assembly 248.88. (photo credit: AP)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The Foreign Ministry on Monday said the boycott by Israel and eight other nations improved the outcome of last month's UN anti-racism conference that was held in Geneva. "Israel's consistent and principled position that it would not participate in the Durban Review Conference, together with the withdrawal of many other democratic countries, contributed to the improvements that were made in the Concluding Statement," the ministry said in a statement. "In the preparatory documents for the Durban Review Conference, systematic attacks were made against Israel, libeling it with absurd charges of racism, apartheid, and genocide. No other country was singled out. This gross injustice was due to the preparatory committee's politicization and hijacking by the worst human rights offenders in the world," such as Iran, Syria and Libya, the ministry said. It added that the State of Israel regrets that a conference designed to address prejudice was exploited "to focus instead on a specific conflict that is exclusively political in nature." It was disappointed, the ministry said, that the Durban Review Conference affirmed in its outcome document the conclusions of the first Durban conference in 2001, which singled out Israel and placed its conflict with the Palestinian within the context of a document about racism. Still, the Foreign Ministry said, it was satisfied "that accusations and incitement directed against it in the original drafts were omitted from the Concluding Statement." The Foreign Ministry said "it became clear" in the aftermath of both conferences, "that many of the issues that came to dominate the debate had essentially nothing to do with a bona fide discussion on racism." In the future, it believed the UN would downscale any further review conferences and keep "inflammatory discourse" away from the genuine work on fighting racism. "While the DRC was a failure, Israel is hopeful that, by exposing its strident flaws, a drastic improvement of the Durban process will take place," the ministry said. But in her concluding statement at the conference, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navanethem Pillay, said there were a number of positive things for Israel in the outcome documents from both conferences, including the obligation to remember the Holocaust, a denouncement of anti-Semitism and the recognition that all states must be secure.

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town