Jerusalem councilwoman raises light rail concerns

By ABE SELIG
April 15, 2010 03:00
2 minute read.

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

A city councilwoman has stepped forward with her concerns regarding contracts signed in the late 1990s that finalized the capital’s light rail project, The Jerusalem Post has learned.

Yael Antebi, who represents the Pisgat Ze’ev neighborhood and until September held the transportation portfolio at city hall, sent a letter this week to the police’s National Fraud Unit concerning a number of issues she said “raised red flags” in connection with the agreements signed between the city, the state and the CityPass consortium, which has overseen construction of the light rail project and will continue to oversee its operation once it is operational.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


“I would like to note the astounding figure of between NIS 1.5 billion and NIS 3b. the state will have to pay [CityPass] as per its contract (which will translate into some NIS 50 million to NIS 100m. a year [for 15 years]), if the number of train users is less than the agreed-upon number forecast in the contract,” Antebi wrote in her letter to fraud investigators.

The forecast for train users, which were agreed upon in the contract as being roughly 10 percent of the 605,000 Jerusalem residents above the age of eight, is “known as fact to be erroneous and incorrect,” she said.

“And even if they were correct,” she continued, “the agreement states that almost double the amount of riders predicted to use the train – using these erroneous numbers – must use the train, or the government has to pay the difference.”

Antebi broke down the numbers:

“The forecasts, which come from the Central Bureau of Statistics and the Transportation Ministry, state that some 60,500 residents will use the train 1.25 times daily,” Antebi said. “When you multiply those numbers together, you get 75,625 daily train rides.



“Now, multiply the number of daily rides by the 305 days a year the train will be in service – it will not operate on Shabbat and holidays – and you get just over 23 million rides a year.

“The agreement with CityPass, however, stipulates that there will be more than 42 million rides a year,” Antebi said. “And if there are less, the state must pay the difference.”

That difference, Antebi said, when billed at NIS 6 a train ticket, would come out to roughly NIS 70m. a year. “And the contract that was signed with CityPass was signed for something like 15 years,” she said. “It might even be 20.”

Antebi said that whoever signed that agreement was “either completely stupid and didn’t understand, or did, and then something is not kosher here.

“And Jerusalem residents, who are the ones footing this bill, deserve to know what happened,” she said. “We deserve answers.”

Antebi also leveled criticisms over the light rail project in general, saying, “This sort of firm, set-in-stone system is not suitable  for Jerusalem.

“What if the security situation demands that we change the route – we can’t. Furthermore, the train won’t provide many of its riders with direct transportation to and from their destinations. They will have to transfer to buses anyway.”   Therefore, Antebi said, she felt the underlying agreements for the rail had been “made in haste” and “without thorough consideration of the public’s best interest.

“Yet others will profit greatly from this,” she said. “The question is who? And that’s what I’ve asked the fraud unit to investigate.”

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town

By SHARON UDASIN