A legal right and a moral imperative

Israel holds legal title to all land that is not privately owned in Judea and Samaria.

September 16, 2014 13:21
3 minute read.

The ‘state lands’ of Gvaot in the Etzion Bloc. (photo credit: REUTERS)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


 IN INTERNATIONAL diplomatic parlance it is customary to term the areas of Judea and Samaria “occupied territories.”

Few people bother to ask the obvious follow-up question: Occupied from whom? Ever since 1967, the term has been used as a knee-jerk mantra to excoriate Israel. Its recent designation of 4,000 dunams (1,000 acres) as “state land” to pave the way for a new city to be called Gvaot has sparked yet another worldwide chorus of denunciation and rebuke. The criticism, however, bears little relation to legal and historical realities.


Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Cookie Settings