US federal courts to consider J'lem passport issue

The US Supreme Court passes back to lower courts the issue of whether Americans born in Jerusalem may list Israel on their passports.

By JTA
March 26, 2012 21:18
1 minute read.
US passport

US passport 311. (photo credit: Thinkstock/Imagebank)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

WASHINGTON -- The US Supreme Court returned to the lower courts the issue of whether Americans born in Jerusalem may list "Israel" on their passports.

The decision delivered Monday was a success for the family of Jerusalem-born boy Menachem Zivotofsky. His family for years has sought to force the State Department to agree to state on his passport that he was born in Israel, citing a law passed by Congress in 2002.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


Former US President George W. Bush signed the law, but in doing so refused to implement it, citing executive prerogative in foreign policy. US President Barak Obama has continued that practice.

The Supreme Court, in an 8-1 decision, overruled lower court decisions that had contended that the judicial branch does not have authority over this area since it is not the courts' place to determine foreign policy.

"The courts are fully capable of determining whether this statute may be given effect, or instead must be struck down in light of authority conferred on the  Executive by the Constitution," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority.

Justice Stephen Breyer dissented.

National Jewish groups backed the Zivotofskys and submitted friend of the court briefs on their behalf.



Among the first groups to welcome the latest decision was the Orthodox Union.

"With the ruling by the high court, Congressional policy on Jerusalem, ignored by successive Administrations, will get its day in court," the OU said in a statement.

Related Content

Joan Rivers
August 28, 2014
Joan Rivers rushed to hospital following throat surgery

By JPOST.COM STAFF