Analysis: OK for Kurds, Shi'ites, but what about Sunnis?

So, what will change as a result of the passing of the constitution? A number of things.

By
October 26, 2005 00:08
2 minute read.
iraqi with gun 88

iraqi with gun 88. (photo credit: )

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

Imagine a document that defines the power, religion, identity, distribution of revenues and freedom of a country's people and government. The power, says the document, can be taken from the central government by any provinces of the country that bond together. The religion is based on one faith and no laws can contradict it. The distribution of revenues depends on where you live. Sound like something you'd want to adopt? Well, that would depend on who you are and where you live. For Iraq's Kurds and the Shi'ites, the new constitution - which passed according to results released Tuesday - is great. The Kurds get independence in their region in the north, and the Shi'ites can form their own mega-region in the south. Not only can they rule over themselves, but they may get to keep the billions of dollars the oil in their regions churns out. But what about the Sunnis? As it is they feel disenfranchised, partly because they refused to vote in January's parliamentary elections and partly because of the purging of the Ba'athists by the interim government. And, as the US administration has learned, not all Ba'athists are bad. So, as expected, most Sunnis voted a big "no" on the constitution. So did minority groups and secular Iraqis who don't like the document's Islamic flavor and fear the country will be divided into three parts. Even Jewish Iraqis living abroad, who were most supportive of the US-invasion of Iraq, oppose it. But here's the catch. Of the 136 articles of the document, some 55 leave their issues to be dealt with later by ending with the words, "And a law shall regulate [or organize] this." In a last-minute addition, US Ambassador to Iraq Zalman Khalilazad forced the Shi'ites and Kurds to add that within four months of the formation of a new government following the December 15 elections, necessary amendments must be made by a group which is representative of Iraqi society. So, what will change as a result of the passing of the constitution? A number of things. While the mostly Sunni-fuelled insurgency will not be one of them, the high Sunni participation in the referendum will likely give Sunni political leaders a boost to participate with less fear in the upcoming elections. Moreover, the document serves at least as some sort of basis from which the Iraqis can move forward by making those "necessary amendments" within the allotted time. Only then will the Iraqis be able to see if they can bridge their ethnic and sectarian divides and unite the country rather than let it rush toward a Balkan-style disintegration.



More about:Iraq

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

A missile from the S-300 anti-aircraft system during the International Army Games in Russia
September 18, 2018
ANALYSIS: What Russia’s Latakia condemnation means for Israel

By SETH J. FRANTZMAN