Senate amends Iran nuclear agreement oversight bill with passage in mind

The White House says it will block legislation that interferes with negotiations between Iran, the US and other world powers over Iran's nuclear program.

By
April 29, 2015 23:08
1 minute read.
Washington

The full moon rises behind the US Capitol Dome in Washington . (photo credit: REUTERS)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

WASHINGTON – US Senate leadership is carefully choosing amendments to a bill that would grant Congress oversight powers over a comprehensive nuclear accord with Tehran.

Authors of the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015 are rejecting amendments strongly opposed by the Obama administration, in an effort to maintain broad bipartisan support on Capitol Hill for its passage.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


The legislation, which currently has the support of more than two-thirds of lawmakers, would require the president to submit a deal promptly to Congress and in its entirety.

The legislature would then have mere weeks to review the deal, and then may choose to vote to approve or disapprove of its participation in the lifting of sanctions.

More broadly, the bill provides Congress with an oversight structure as the deal is implemented, Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman Bob Corker (R-Tennessee), the bill’s author, argues.

He has proposed an amendment in recent days that would require the administration to submit both the English and Iranian-drafted Farsi versions of the agreement, which ostensibly will cap, restrict, monitor and partially roll back Tehran’s nuclear program for a finite period.

After a political framework was announced in Lausanne on April 2, the White House and Iran’s Foreign Ministry released contradictory fact sheets on its contents. Corker seeks to avoid similar confusion with a final agreement, he says.

JPOST VIDEOS THAT MIGHT INTEREST YOU:


But on Tuesday, the Senate rejected an effort to require the agreement with Iran to be considered a treaty, which would have forced it to be approved by two-thirds of the Senate’s 100 members before it could take effect.

Currently, the provision that allows for a vote of disapproval also allows the chamber to forgo a vote. But the US Constitution requires the consent of Congress for the ratification of treaties.

The Obama administration opposes calling the emerging deal a treaty, and instead calls it a multilateral agreement or, more formally, a comprehensive joint plan of action.

The Senate voted 57-39 to reject the treaty clause, which would have required the support of 60 senators to pass.

Nevertheless, its support from 39 Republicans showed that there could be intense debate in the coming days as the Senate agrees on a final version of the legislation.

Reuters contributed to this report.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
October 16, 2018
The curious case of ‘woke’ Ahmadinejad

By LAHAV HARKOV