Why can Gazans get mops, not vinegar?

Court gives government 30 days to explain restrictions on importing humanitarian aid into Strip.

January 22, 2010 12:29
2 minute read.
A Jordanian driver checks trucks loaded with human

aid into gaza 190.114. (photo credit: AP)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Why does allow flour into the Gaza Strip but prohibit vinegar and coriander? Why did it suddenly drop the ban on the import of diapers, mops, black pepper and savory two months ago? How does preventing shoes and children's toys from entering enhance 's security? These are some of the questions which human rights organization Gisha - for Freedom of Movement said on Wednesday it hopes to receive answers to in the wake of a decision on Thursday by the Tel Aviv District Court.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

The court gave the state 30 days to produce documents requested by the petitioner under the Freedom of Information Act or to explain why it refused to do so.

In the petition, Gisha told the court it had written to Defense Minister Ehud Barak on April 22, 2009, asking which criteria were used to define humanitarian supplies, what were the regulations guiding the work of the Coordinator of Activities in the Territories and whether there were lists of commodities permitted or prohibited from export to .

Gisha charged that the Defense Ministry provided incomplete answers to its questions. On June 14 it presented a long list of questions and requested answers in accordance with the Freedom of Information Law.

Among the questions: What are humanitarian supplies? Are there criteria for determining what constitutes humanitarian supplies? Is there a list of commodities that are prohibited from entering ? What are the regulations for examining requests to bring in supplies to ? Gisha charged that the Defense Ministry gave it the run-around for several months and did not reply to the questions.

In one of its letters asking for a progress report from the Defense Ministry, Gisha also asked it to provide the so-called "red-lines" document, which allegedly determined the minimum nutrition level required to sustain the Palestinian population in Gaza and included detailed tables on the number of calories and grams of each type of food which should be made available to the Gaza residents according to age and sex.

Reports that such a "red-line" document existed first appeared in a newspaper report on June 15, 2009.

After failing to receive a response to its questions, Gisha petitioned the Tel Aviv District Court in October to order the Defense Ministry to provide the information in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act.

The state finally replied to Gisha's questions on January 13. Regarding the "red lines" document, Guy Inbar, the spokesman of the Coordinator of Activities wrote, "There is no official red-lines document. Your request might refer to one of several drafts of internal staff memos written about this matter and regarding which there is no obligation by law to make them available. The office of the Coordinator of Activities examines the requirements of the population all the time."

The court found the state's response to the petition unsatisfactory and gave it 30 days to either produce the documents or explain why it refused to do so.

Related Content

July 19, 2018
Sources close to Netanyahu: Trump knew the Iran nuclear deal was bad