Finance Committee defers vote on mandatory spending cuts

Under current law, the limit budgetary spending is allowed to increase based on a rolling average of the last ten year’s economic growth.

March 3, 2014 18:38
2 minute read.
The Knesset.

Knesset 370. (photo credit: Marc Israel Sellem/The Jerusalem Post)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The Knesset Finance Committee on Monday deferred a vote to change the budgetary spending limit, a change that would curtail spending significantly and require cuts.

Under current law, the limit budgetary spending is allowed to increase based on a rolling average of the last ten year’s economic growth, which in 2015 would come out to a 3.8% spending increase.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

The proposed law would change the method of calculation to one based on how far off Israel’s debt-to-GDP ratio is from its goal, which in 2015 would bring the limit down to 2.6%, requiring billions of cuts in planned spending.

“The government decided to give a death blow to the welfare state, as it continues to break its promises to voters,” said Labor MK Michal Biran, who led the assault on the change. “If civilian spending is currently the lowest in the OECD, except for South Korea, by the end of the decade we will surely close the gap.”

Proponents of the change noted that lowers spending meant the government would not be forced to raise taxes by the equivalent amount in order to hit its deficit target.

“The process will balance between the growth of expenditures, which will allow an increase in the standard of living, and on the other hand will prevent a drastic increase in taxes,” Finance Ministry budget director Amir Levy said.

As is, he said, tax revenues are expected to be 1.7% lower than expected by the end of the decade. With future growth expected to be close to 3% in the coming years, versus 4.5% growth in previous years, the old method of calculating increases would be skewed upward.

Even the new system would allow spending per person to continue growing, but reduce Israel’s debt. That, Levy argued, would in turn would reduce interest payments, which he likened to throwing money in the trash.

Israel’s moves to reduce its debt have cut its interest payments from NIS 80 billion to NIS 40 billion over the past decade. That, he said, was a better way to ensure continued spending on Israel’s citizens.

Aside from MKs from Finance Minister Yair Lapid’s Yesh Atid party, few other committee members were persuaded.

“We must differentiate between a deficit limit that can be justified economically and a spending limit that is ideological, a war against welfare mechanisms,” said Hadash MK Dov Hanin, who added that Israel already spent considerably less than its European counterparts on social services.

If the current formula isn’t broken, asked Shas MK Yithak Cohen, why fix it? 

“We managed to bring down the debt-to-GDP ratio, so why change it? Interest payments are going down, and the fruits of growth must be distributed to the public. The current formula is correct, but fiscally and socially,” he said.

Related Content

August 31, 2014
Rioting resumes throughout east Jerusalem Saturday night