State appeals shortening of rapist’s sentence

Zahar was convicted in the Military Appeals Court in 2006 of raping and sexually assaulting a junior female officer.

August 25, 2011 08:27
1 minute read.
[illustrative photo]

Court gavel justice judge legal law 311. (photo credit: Thinkstock/Imagebank)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The State Attorney’s Office revealed on Wednesday it had filed a petition to the High Court of Justice against the recent ruling by a military judicial panel to take 18 months off Pvt. Ataf Zahar’s six-year rape sentence.

Zahar was convicted in the Military Appeals Court in Tel Aviv’s Kirya military headquarters in 2006 of raping and sexually assaulting a junior female officer.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

In addition to his prison term, Zahar was ordered to pay NIS 35,000 in compensation and was reduced to the rank of private from colonel.

In 2007, the Supreme Court had rejected an appeal by Zahar against his conviction.

The petition, filed by state prosecutor Hila Gorni, argues that the ruling, which leaves Zahar serving a four-year term, is unreasonable.

The term should reflect the serious injury to the army’s confidence in its commanding officers, the petition said.

The state prosecution also alleges that the panel’s decision to mitigate Zahar’s sentence contains many flaws, including regarding Zahar’s chances of rehabilitation.

The High Court is set to debate the matter next Monday.

Related Content

August 31, 2014
Rioting resumes throughout east Jerusalem Saturday night