Right slams purported security cabinet decision to withdraw from Gaza Strip

Hawks says the decision projected weakness to Hamas and its Islamic fundamentalist allies and sponsors led by Iran; Feiglin: Iran is happy; the next round will be with them.

By GIL STERN STERN HOFFMAN
August 3, 2014 00:14
1 minute read.
Moshe Feiglin.

Moshe Feiglin 311 . (photo credit: Marc Israel Sellem)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Knesset members on the Right sharply criticized Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and the security cabinet on Saturday night for their decision to withdraw some IDF troops from the Gaza Strip.

They said the decision projects weakness to Hamas and its Islamist fundamentalist allies and sponsors led by Iran.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


“The rest of the tentacles of Islamist fundamentalism are happy tonight,” Likud MK Moshe Feiglin said. “There is no doubt that the picture of the IDF ending its ground operation without defeating Hamas encourages our Islamist fundamentalist enemies. If you don’t annihilate Hamas, the next round will be against Iran, Hizbullah, ISIS, and the Islamists inside Israel.”

Feiglin said the real enemy of Israel is not tunnels or rockets, but an “octopus of Islamist fundamentalism” of which Hamas is one tentacle threatening Israel’s future.

“Calling the goal merely neutralizing the tunnels is to fight the symptom, not the problem,” Feiglin said.

“If we fight on only one front, we strengthen the tentacles of the octopus.”

Feiglin blamed Netanyahu for not abandoning his support for a Palestinian state and the entire Oslo diplomatic process, even after Hamas’s latest attack on Israel.



His Likud colleague, MK Danny Danon, said Netanyahu and the security cabinet acted in “the spirit of [Hatnua leader] Tzipi Livni” when it ordered IDF troops to withdraw.

“When facing terrorism, fighting, not hesitating, is required,” he said.

“Hamas has not been defeated and the countdown to the next round has already begun. Without defeating Hamas, long-term quiet will not be achieved.”

Construction and Housing Minister Uri Ariel (Bayit Yehudi) called upon Netanyahu to convene the cabinet immediately to deal with the security situation and make decisions in the widest forum possible about how to continue efforts to defend the residents of the State of Israel.

Coalition chairman Yariv Levin defended the decision, telling Ynet that “There is no point in staying where we already finished dealing with the tunnels.”

Responding to the criticism from the Right at a press conference in Tel Aviv, Netanyahu reiterated that “All the options are on the table to guarantee Israel long-term quiet.”

Related Content

Abu Ubaida
August 28, 2014
Media are Hamas’s main strategic weapons, says visiting US historian

By BENJAMIN WEINTHAL