Lion's Den: The new Arab revolt

Pessimism serves as a career enhancer in Middle East studies. But, with due hesitation, I see changes that could augur a new era

By
March 1, 2011 23:20
4 minute read.
Protesters at a demonstration in Beirut, yesterday

Lebanon protests_311 Reuters. (photo credit: REUTERS/STR New)

Unprecedented convulsions across the Middle East, from Morocco to Iran, prompt three reflections: First, these rebellions fit into the context of a regional chessboard, what I call the Middle East Cold War. On one side stands the “resistance” bloc led by Iran and including Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Gaza and Qatar; it seeks to shake up the existing order with a new one, more piously Islamic and more hostile to the West. On the other side stands the status-quo bloc, led by Saudi Arabia and including most of the rest of the region (implicitly including Israel); it prefers things to stay more or less as they are.

The former (but not Syria) have an agenda, the latter (except Israel) want primarily to enjoy the fruits of power. (Caged tigers, anyone? Or a private concert by Mariah Carey?) The former enjoy the appeal of offering a vision, the latter can deploy lots of guns, lots of them.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


Second, while developments in Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Yemen and Bahrain have great significance, there are only two regional geostrategic giants – Iran and Saudi Arabia – and both are potentially vulnerable.

Discontent within the Islamic Republic of Iran became manifest in June 2009, when a rigged election brought massive crowds onto the streets.

Although the authorities managed to suppress the “Green Movement,” they could not stifle it and it remains underground. Despite Tehran’s strenuous efforts to lay claim to the new revolts across the region, portraying them as inspired by the Iranian revolution of 1978-79 and by its own brand of Islamism, these revolts more likely will inspire Iranians to renew their own assault on the Khomeinist order.

Were such a counterrevolution to succeed, the implications would go far beyond Iran, affecting the Nonproliferation Treaty regime, Israeli security, Iraq’s future, the global energy market and – perhaps most critical of all – the Islamist movement. Bereft of the most important “resistance” government, the Islamist movement worldwide would likely begin to decline.

The kingdom of Saudi Arabia is no ordinary state.



Its power lies in a unique combination of Wahhabi doctrine, control over Mecca and Medina, and oil and gas reserves. In addition, its leaders boast an exceptional record of outside-the-box policies. Still, geographical, ideological and personal differences among Saudis could cause its fall; the key question would then be to whom. Shi’ites, who resent their second-class status and would presumably move the country toward Iran? Purist Wahhabis, who scorn the monarchical adaptations to modernity and would replicate the Taliban order in Afghanistan? Or both in the case of a split? Or perhaps liberals (hitherto a negligible force), who find their voice and lead an overthrow of the antiquated, corrupt, extremist Saudi order?

THIS LATTER thought leads to my third and most unexpected observation: The revolts over the past two months have been largely constructive, patriotic and open in spirit. Political extremism of any sort, leftist or Islamist, has been largely absent from the streets.

Conspiracy theories have been the refuge of decayed rulers, not exuberant crowds. The United States, Great Britain and Israel have been conspicuously absent from the sloganeering.

(Libyan strongman Muammar Gaddafi blamed the unrest in his country on al-Qaida spreading hallucinogenic drugs!) Citizen cleanups in Tahrir Square symbolize a new civic spirit.

One has the sense that the past century’s extremism – tied to such figures as Amin al- Husseini, Gamal Abdel Nasser, Ruhollah Khomeini, Yasser Arafat and Saddam Hussein – has run its course, that populations seek something more mundane and consumable than rhetoric, rejectionism and backwardness.

Pessimism serves as a career enhancer in Middle East studies, and I am known for doom-and-gloom. But, with due hesitation, I see changes that could augur a new era, one in which infantilized Arabic-speakers mature into adults. One rubs one’s eyes at this transformation, awaiting its reversal.

So far, however, it has held.

Perhaps the most genial symbol of this maturation is the pattern of street demonstrators cleaning up after themselves. No longer are they wards of the state, dependent on it for services; all of a sudden, they are citizens with a sense of civic responsibility.

While cautious about premising foreign policies on this abrupt improvement, it would also be a mistake to reject it. The rebel movements need an opportunity to find themselves and to act as adults. The time has come to discard the soft bigotry of low expectations; speaking Arabic or Persian does not make one incapable of building the democratic means to attain free ends.

The writer (www.DanielPipes.org) is director of the Middle East Forum and Taube distinguished visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution of Stanford University.


Related Content

June 20, 2018
What are the American and Israeli challenges in the Middle East now?

By ERIC R. MANDEL