Preserving Israel’s coastline

A dispute between developers and environmental-historical interests is symbolic of a larger struggle over the fate of the nation’s coastline and coastal dunes.

December 26, 2012 21:01
3 minute read.
AN ARTIST’S rendition of the planned promenade

Zevulun Beach (370). (photo credit: Courtesy)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


The Jerusalem District Court recently rejected an appeal by the Caesarea Edmond Rothschild Development Corporation to build a new neighborhood abutting the coastline at Caesarea.

The judge said that approval of the plan would cause “irreparable damage to ancient remains, harm the cultural heritage of the State of Israel, as well as eliminate one of the important archeological sites of the country.”

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

Caesarea is the site of a famous port city constructed by King Herod in 22 CE that was once home to almost 100,000 people. Modern Caesarea is home to a more modest 4,500 people.

Yet this dispute between developers and environmental-historical interests is symbolic of a larger struggle over the fate of the nation’s coastline and coastal dunes.

According to a paper by Hebrew University geographer Noam Levin, Israel’s coastal dunes have declined from 462 square kilometers in 1948 to fewer than 185 today.

During the pre-state period the sand dunes were seen as a threat to attempts to carve out Jewish communities in the Coastal Plain, since the dunes used to expand inland at a rate of several meters a year, laying waste potential agricultural land. With the massive development of coastal communities after 1950, such as Ashdod, Ashkelon, Tel Aviv and Netanya, however, the dunes gave way to development and vacation communities.

Today, housing and tourist projects are seen as threats to some of the last remaining large areas of sand dunes and coastal cliffs. For instance, a recent plan for an industrial park next to Ashdod would see construction over an estimated 13 hectares of sand dunes. According to the Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel, the project would “reduce open, natural spaces that are home to a wide variety of flora and fauna and damage the largest concentration of sycamore fig trees in the belt of sycamore figs between the Dan region and Ashkelon. This is a unique habitat, resembling nowhere else in Israel.”


Palmahim Beach, another wild portion of the coast south of Tel Aviv, home to a large air force base, was also the site of planned construction, of a vacation resort, that caused a major controversy. In 2010, the Environmental Protection Ministry canceled plans to build a 350-room hotel there.

Plans to build a coastal promenade at Zevulun Beach in Herzliya, however, will proceed despite environmental objections.

The current government has worked to pass comprehensive legislation to protect the coast. In July, the Ministerial Committee on Legislative Affairs approved an amendment to the 2004 Law for the Protection of the Coastal Environment.

Gilad Erdan, the environmental protection minister, declared: “Very little space is left on the beach areas for the enjoyment of the public, and there is no reason to continue to block them with concrete monsters.”

As the Caesarea case illustrates, however,there still exist numerous disputes regarding coastal development. The desire to develop land, especially to build affordable housing, confronts an environmental lobby that would prefer to see no development.

The coastal zone is home not only to unique environmental ecosystems and important archeological treasures at sites such as Ashkelon, Caesarea, Apollonia (Arsuf) and Achziv. Some portions of the coastal zone are dominated by military bases and infrastructure, such as Palmahim, Rafael Advanced Defense Systems north of Kiryat Yam, and the naval base at Atlit. This preserves the sites from encroaching development. In addition, a network of national parks and nature reserves dot Israel’s coastline.

It would be best, however, if the coastal zone became part of a national master plan to create a network of local authorities, planning institutions, and environmental and archeological interests, to create a streamlined planning process for the zone that would prevent piecemeal decisions that affect individual areas.

The current government tried to implement a new streamlined planning process that would be a step in the right direction. Environmental groups opposed this because they believe the network of local committees and recourse to the courts provide them leverage against development. A better system would be to incorporate environmental and archeological objections into a stage of the proposed streamlined planning process, providing a voice to protect Israel’s unique coastal environment.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Britain’s Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn joins an anti-Trump protest in central London on July 13, 2018
November 15, 2018
What is Europe without Jews?