January 21: Lose the hyperbole

There’s nothing unreasonable about mainstream Israelis who desire to know who’s funding NGOs that call into question Israel’s very legitimacy as a Jewish state.

By JERUSALEM POST READERS
January 20, 2011 23:20
3 minute read.
letters

letters 88. (photo credit: Courtesy)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Lose the hyperbole

Sir, – I’m a bit fed up with the intemperate use of hyperbole these days.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


Between Alon Pinkas’s rant how Israelis despise each other (“Our love of hate,” January 19) and Gershon Baskin’s piece stating that we’re a repressive society (“To be suspect,” Encountering Peace, January 18), along with a few letters objecting to Ashley Perry’s “Best decision I ever made” (“Put down those glasses,” January 18), it seems we’ve lost a bit of perspective.

Forget about a cup that is half-full – Israel’s cup is, by any objective measure, practically brimming over, at least for those with eyes to see and hearts to feel.

Of course, we have improvements to make in our security approach and services, and we have our divisions and enmity, but really, a bit of moderation in the discourse, please.

There’s nothing unreasonable about mainstream Israelis who desire to know who’s funding NGOs that call into question Israel’s very legitimacy as a Jewish state and demonize its leaders and the IDF. The parliamentary committee in question, reflecting a public demand for transparency by NGOs, neither attempts to nor can stifle legitimate debate in Israeli society, and is not a symbol of a new “illiberal” trend.

Attempts to portray it as such are not only demagoguery – they smack of defensive propaganda.



What’s truly illiberal is the attempt by NGOs to deny or distract attention from these sources while adopting the antagonistic language and agenda of their sponsors, from labeling Israel an “apartheid” state to advocating BDS tactics.

As for Pinkas’s related reflections on supposed animosity within Israeli society, methinks he’s spent too many years abroad. Perhaps his diplomatic talents should remain focused on his (excellent) work with foreign governments, as his observations on Israeli society don’t reflect the reality on the ground upon which I and most of us live every day: where Sephardi/Ashkenazi/Left/Ri ght/Center/religious/traditional/ less-observant Jews and Arabs work together, socialize, communicate and enjoy a standard of living and freedom of speech, religion, expression and the like that is unparalleled not only in the region, but in the world.

ARYEH GREEN
Beit Shemesh

Different system

Sir, – I don’t know where Jeff Barak has been living since he left his job at The Jerusalem Post. But his piece on January 17 calling for the dismissal of Avigdor Lieberman (“Enough is enough,” Reality Check) sounds as if he’s been in the US and has forgotten anything he might have known about Israeli politics.

Unlike in the US, ministers here do not serve at the pleasure of the president and cannot be dismissed without endangering the continuity of the government. In Israel we have a coalition government.

Lieberman’s party represents a large segment of Israel’s population and its point of view deserves and needs to be expressed, even if it appears to contradict Netanyahu’s “soft” policy toward the Palestinians.

Barak appears to want to silence all those who differ with his own soft attitude.

GENE SUCOV
Jerusalem

Focus on terrorists

Sir, – Regarding “Turkel panel delays flotilla findings” (January 17), the findings will be incomplete unless they highlight the profiles of the 50-odd terrorists among the large number of pacifists demonstrating against the blockade on Gaza.

The terrorists embarked at a separate location, were not subjected to passport control, and fervently expressed hope that they would be able to attack any boarding party and in the process be killed as martyrs and proceed immediately to paradise.

The full backgrounds of the terrorists, especially the nine who were killed, should be given full coverage to remove all doubts that there was any connection between them and the protesters.

DAVID GOSHEN
Kiryat Ono

Related Content

TRAVELERS WAIT in line at Ben-Gurion International Airport. Let critics come to Israel and see this
August 17, 2018
Editor's Notes: Politics at our borders

By YAAKOV KATZ