Race against space

A single bi-national state, in which Israelis, Palestinians enjoy equal civil, political rights, could ensure access to land they hold dear, sacred.

By KHALED DIAB
July 21, 2011 21:43
Victory signs flashed in front of Palestinian flag

palestinian flag_311. (photo credit: REUTERS/Ali Jarekji)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Perched on a scenic hilltop named “Mont de Joie” (Mountain of Joy) by the Crusaders for its commanding view of the Jerusalem they were about to conquer, Nabi Samwil’s 250 or so Palestinian inhabitants have little to feel joyous about. They are cut off – by Israeli settlements and the separation wall – from the rest of the West Bank, while the West Bank IDs they carry deprive them of access to Jerusalem, even though Israel considers their village to be within the municipal boundaries of the city.

“We’ve become like a tiny island,” describes Mohammed Barakat, a local lawyer, who lives with three branches of his family (i.e. 13 people), in a small house of about 120 meters. As he speaks, Barakat, who was crippled in a car crash in Amman, is sitting on his bed working on his computer, one of the few connections he has with the outside world. In addition to being a key advocate of the villagers’ rights, Barakat runs an NGO appropriately called – given the confinement of his village – Disabled Without Borders.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


One practical problem associated with their imposed isolation is getting relatives and friends from other parts of the West Bank into the village.

Mohammed’s brother, Rebhi, who is a member of the village council, is somewhat anxious about a local wedding that is due to take place later in the week.

“The Israeli Civil Administration insists on knowing the names of everyone who is coming,” he complains. “But you can never know who exactly is coming, because each person you invite usually brings along their family and friends.”

The villagers’ woes don’t end there.

Owing to draconian Israeli building and movement restrictions, the bride and groom, like many other young people, will be forced to abandon the village in search of housing and jobs elsewhere. Villagers report that only two houses have been built since Israel took over control in 1967, while numerous homes were demolished near the mosque and the tomb that is believed by some from all three Abrahamic faiths – despite the absence of archaeological or biblical evidence – to house the prophet Samuel.



One of the sad consequences of this inability to build which, I witnessed, is that some two dozen children have to squeeze into the village’s tiny one-room school, which will soon lack a properly functioning toilet because the one they built has a demolition order on it.

Isolated as Nabi Samwil is, it is not an isolated case – demolitions and displacements are a daily fact of life. This is clearly illustrated in a soon to be published report by the UN’s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). Entitled Forced Out, the sobering document focuses on displaced communities in Area C, more than 60 percent of the West Bank over which Israel retains full civil and security control under the Oslo Accords.

It documents how local communities – faced with restrictions on their movement, a freeze on building and settler violence and intimidation – are facing severe housing shortages, with many compelled to move to densely populated and overcrowded Areas A and B, poor or nonexistent public services, and high unemployment.

Among the hardest hit are farming communities and the Beduin herders in the Jordan Valley, some of whom have even resorted to building concrete structures inside their tents in an attempt to conceal them from the army.

“While the intent behind the various policies applied by Israel to Area C is unclear, their effect is to make it impossible for many Palestinian communities to develop,” says UN Humanitarian Coordinator Maxwell Gaylard who expresses “concerns about demographic shifts and changes to the ethnic make-up of Area C.”

Although Israel’s intentions are indeed unclear, the fact that a sharp increase in demolitions and evictions has taken place this year suggests to me a bid to create “realities on the ground” before the Palestinian leadership gets a chance to go to the UN to seek recognition for an independent Palestine. OCHA’s records show that over 700 Palestinians have been forcibly displaced and 1,500 have lost their livelihoods so far this year in Area C and east Jerusalem, which is four times higher than over the same period in 2010.

Area C, where settlements gain building permission with ease and are subsidized by the state, is currently home to twice as many Israeli settlers as Palestinians (300,000 as opposed to 150,000). Nevertheless, it possesses the majority of Palestinian agricultural and grazing land and is the only contiguous territory in the West Bank, which was foreseen to provide, under the ‘land for peace’ formula, the bulk of the space upon which a future Palestinian state would be established.

However, with 70% of Area C currently set aside for settlements or the IDF, there is little room left for the two-state solution. This might partly explain why the Palestinian leadership, caught as it is in a race against space, has desperately resorted to the UN path, despite its slim chances of success.

But it is not just Palestinians who should be worried about the changing reality of Area C and east Jerusalem, ordinary Israelis should be, too. If current policies remain unchecked, most of the Palestinian population will soon be living in a series of disconnected islands that will be impossible to join up into a coherent territory, leading to a de facto single Israeli-Palestinian state.

In my view, a single bi-national state, in which Israelis and Palestinians enjoy equal civil and political rights, could ensure both peoples access to the land they hold dear and sacred in its entirety.

Although a growing minority of Israelis supports this vision, most favor a state with a clearly Jewish identity which, by implication, makes them supporters of an independent Palestine on the pre-1967 borders. However, the current government, which holds the land to be holier than its people, is unlikely to take any meaningful steps to achieve the two-state vision.

This leaves it up to ordinary Israelis to bring pressure to bear on the government to act now or risk forever holding back peace. Last Friday, some 4,500 protesters, mostly Israelis, marched through east Jerusalem to voice their support for an independent Palestine. The time has come for hundreds of thousands more to join them.

Related Content

TRAVELERS WAIT in line at Ben-Gurion International Airport. Let critics come to Israel and see this
August 17, 2018
Editor's Notes: Politics at our borders

By YAAKOV KATZ