The hijacking of apartheid

The Palestinians and her supporters have blindly but broadly attempted to brand Israel as a racist criminal state.

December 11, 2013 22:45
3 minute read.
Boycotting Israel

Israel boycott 370. (photo credit: REUTERS)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

In remembering Nelson Mandela, we most recall his determined leadership in bringing down apartheid – the separation of races – in South Africa. His passing after a lifetime of suffering extreme prejudice and hatred causes us all to pause in honor of his deeds and respect for his commitment to justice and equality.

The term “apartheid” evokes not only images of the struggle of his people in South Africa, but is also a concept that is often used, and sometimes misused, by advocates determined to achieve their own goals for their own purposes.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

Such is the case when the term “apartheid” is thrown around in an accusatory framework against the State of Israel, which suffers regularly in the United Nations and in the press from the untrue and unfounded accusation that Israel, in building the terrorism prevention security fence, has built an “apartheid wall.”

For decades at the United Nations and in the press, the Palestinians and her supporters have blindly but broadly attempted to brand Israel as a racist criminal state, adopting resolutions equating Zionism with racism and continuing the war of words against Israel in repeated UN Conferences and resolutions.

The theme is simple and has been quite effective: brand Israel as Zionist...

brand Zionism as racism. With racism and apartheid being criminal... brand Israelis as part of a Zionist racist criminal conspiracy to commit apartheid.

This ugly effort lives on without regard to the truth.

During the raging second intifada when Palestinian terrorists were infiltrating Israel for the purpose of murder, maiming and heinous acts of terror, including suicide-homicide bombings, as well as gun and grenade attacks upon innocent people, Israel took the necessary and correct decision to defend and protect her people. This decision took various forms, including steps to provide security on the edges of the land located between Israel and the Palestinian territories, particularly between Israel and Gaza and between Israel and the Judea and Samaria areas of ancient Israel situated on the West Bank of the Jordan River.

Construction of the security fence began in 2001 in an attempt to keep out the terrorists and has proven to be most effective in saving life, limb and the fiber and fabric of families and communities.

Exactly 10 years ago on December 9, 2003, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution referring to the International Court of Justice the question of the legal consequences of Israel’s construction of the security fence, calling it a “wall.” Israel’s opponents continually refer to it as a “separation barrier” for the specific purpose of evoking the image of separation between Israel and the Palestinians in a hijacking of the term “apartheid.”

The use of the ugly term “apartheid” in conjunction with wrongful accusations that Israel is a criminal racist state evidenced by the building of the security fence as a “separation wall,” are unfair, untrue and malign of the good name of Israel and the Jewish people.

In memory of president Mandela, it is both timely and fitting to issue a call for the world to cease the inappropriate, unfair and untrue use of the term “apartheid” when referring to Israel, the nation-state of the Jewish people. In that spirit, it should be remembered, acknowledged and appreciated that the Jewish people have historically stood against racism; have always stood for civil and individual rights; have always stood for the dignity and human rights of men, women and children from all religions, all races, all sexes, all national origins; and with a commitment to freedom, liberty and justice for all.

The author serves as Senior Counsel of the Washington, DC, law firm Heideman Nudelman & Kalik, PC, representing victims of terrorism and international human rights violations and is the author of The Hague Odyssey: Israel’s Struggle for Security on the Front Lines of Terrorism and Her Battle for Justice at the United Nations (Bartleby Press, 2013; see Contact: info@thehagueodyssey.

Related Content

August 19, 2018
Letters to the Editor: August 20, 2018