WASHINGTON WATCH: A House divided

When it comes to the Jewish community, Republicans are essentially a one-issue party.

By
September 30, 2015 22:04
house of representatives

The chamber of the House of Representatives on Capitol Hill in Washington [File]. (photo credit: REUTERS)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

“A house divided against itself cannot stand” – A. Lincoln, 1858, Republican senate candidate.

The battle to succeed Speaker John Boehner following his sudden but not unexpected resignation will move the House GOP leadership farther to the Right and away from the overwhelming majority of Jewish voters.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


When it comes to the Jewish community, Republicans are essentially a one-issue party. Boehner, like many in his caucus, has been a strong supporter of Israel, but on the domestic agenda there’s a precipitous drop in appeal.

Take the immediate issue that prompted Boehner to move up his departure. His nemesis, the GOP’s far Right, was willing to shut down the government in their zeal to cut off federal funding for Planned Parenthood and threatened to depose the speaker unless he went along. Instead he decided to move up his planned retirement – he said he intended to announce it on November 17, his 66th birthday – to preempt his critics.

By three-to-one margins, Jewish voters support a woman’s right to abortion, contraception and family planning.

Although not a federal cent going to Planned Parenthood pays for abortions, that was irrelevant to the conservatives who decided to make that their big wedge issue against Democrats.

The influential “values voters” of the religious Right are demanding that the next speaker and the next GOP presidential candidate share their uncompromising views on abortion, gay marriage and other hot button social issues.



Similar wide gaps also exist on issues like global warming, environmental and consumer protection, health care reform, Medicare and Social Security funding, immigration reform, aid to education, food stamps and more.

It is the far Right’s opposition to increasing the debt ceiling that portends another government shutdown and that Boehner hopes to avert with his resignation, which would neutralize any threat to overthrow him. The Congress is expected this week to pass a short-term funding bill that will only delay the battle until mid-December.

The far-right bloc, which calls itself the Freedom Caucus, may only have about 50 of the 247 House Republicans but they hold many of their colleagues hostage with threats of primary challenges. For proof they point to erstwhile Rep.

Eric Cantor, the majority leader who wasn’t conservative enough for the tea-baggers and was soundly defeated by a GOP primary challenger from the farther Right, David Brat. That left his colleagues stunned and scared of similar fates.

IRONICALLY, HAD Cantor paid more attention to his district, he might have become the first Jewish speaker in history. He was the only Jewish Republican in the 113th Congress and the highest-ranking Jew ever in either the House or Senate. Boehner said that he had intended to retire at the end of 2014 but with Cantor’s defeat he decided to stay on another year.

Cantor echoed Boehner’s assessment that their party’s far Right is unrealistic. Writing in The New York Times this weekend he said, “The tragedy here is that these voices have not been honest with our fellow conservatives. They have not been honest about what can be accomplished when your party controls Congress, but not the White House.”

He learned from painful experience that the party’s extremists consider compromise and Boehner’s streak of pragmatism mortal sins. They insist they were sent to Washington on a holy mission to shrink the government and enforce their version of Christian morality; any deviation would be a betrayal of their mandate.

Publicly, Boehner referred to his critics as “false prophets” who promised more than they could deliver. Privately he used words like “knuckleheads” and “jackasses.”

Congress needs leaders who can solve problems, not create new ones. A change of leadership won’t heal the wounds in the GOP or broaden its national base, only reinforce the grip of the extremists.

The GOP that is at war with itself. Moderate Republicans are near extinction in the House, with the party split between the far Right and the extreme Right.

The man most likely to succeed Boehner, Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California, is considered amiable but weak. He has better relations with the Freedom Caucus than Boehner but it won’t take long for him to be caught between the “no compromise” extremists and the reality of governing.

McCarthy, 50, has been in the house less than nine years; that would be a quick rise to the top but no match for 34-year-old Henry Clay who was elected speaker on his first day in office.

Israel is not atop the agenda for most Jewish voters but for Republicans it is their best appeal to Jews, especially those with deep pockets like Sheldon Adelson. That is behind the party’s intense campaign to portray Barack Obama and Democrats as enemies of the Jewish state. They partnered with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his ambassador, himself a former Republican operative.

Boehner will be remembered as the speaker who secretly invited the Israeli leader to speak to Congress to boost the Republican campaign to defeat the Iranian nuclear agreement negotiated by Obama. Anyone who doubted the opposition to the Iran deal wasn’t overwhelmingly partisan should consider that Republicans voted unanimously against it, many announcing their opposition from the outset and few even bothering to read the final documents.

The speech led to the most serious crisis in US-Israel relations in nearly 25 years since president George H.W.

Bush threatened to cut aid unless Israel halted settlement construction.

The Dermer-Boehner-Netanyahu ploy did great damage to Democratic support for Israel on Capitol Hill and made the ambassador virtually persona non grata at the White House. The Jewish Telegraphic Agency reported that Congressional Democrats are “no longer eager to return calls from the Israeli embassy.”

Polls show Democratic support for Israel in Congress slipping, particularly in view of Netanyahu’s alliance with Republicans, his antipathy toward the Democratic president and his lack of progress toward peace.

That may be bad news for Israel but it’s good news for Republicans, who see Israel as a major political wedge issue in seeking Jewish support – not from voters but from Israel- focused big givers.

It is also a critical issue for the party’s much larger and more influential evangelical base.

The GOP can count on a substantial segment of Orthodox Jewish voters, a small but growing minority who identify with their hardline positions on Israel and on domestic social issues. But how much farther the party can move toward the extreme Right and still retain support of wealthy Jewish conservatives who have been bankrolling it remains to be seen.

The greatest challenge facing the next speaker will be healing the rift between the pragmatic conservatives and the scorched-earth conservatives. When Republicans won control of both the House and Senate after last year’s election they said it was an opportunity show the nation they could govern and their key to winning back the White House. So far all they’ve demonstrated is, as the New York Times editorialized, they “are incapable

Related Content

Tours Azrieli à Tel-Aviv
August 20, 2018
The Lounge: August 21, 2018

By MICHAL GALANTI