5 reasons why Nasrallah’s threat to use Iraq and Iran fighters against Israel is alarming

Israeli policymakers and experts who have been warning the US about Iran for years, may find more open ears in Washington in the wake of Nasrallah’s comments.

Hezbollah members carry mock rockets next to a poster of the group's leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah [FIle] (photo credit: REUTERS)
Hezbollah members carry mock rockets next to a poster of the group's leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah [FIle]
(photo credit: REUTERS)
In a startling revelation on Friday, Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah said that the next war with Israel could see thousands of Shia militia fighters join forces with Hezbollah to fight Israel. “This could open the way for thousands, even hundreds of thousands of fighters from all over the Arab and Islamic world to participate – from Iraq, Yemen, Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan,” he said in a speech broadcast on television.
This threat marks a major development and turning point in Hezbollah’s threats against Israel. The following are five reasons that Hezbollah’s latest statement has ramifications for Israel and the region.
1.The threat confirms what security experts and commentators have predicted
In recent years Iran has been accused of attempting to create a route to the sea via Iraq, Syria and Lebanon.
This would link Tehran with its allies in Baghdad, Damascus and Beirut.
These allies include the Iraqi based Shia militias called Hashd al-Shaabi (often called Popular Mobilization Units or PMU) which became an official arm of the Iraqi government in 2016. Iran is also the main backer of Syria’s Bashar al-Assad and Hezbollah in Lebanon. It has transferred missiles and other weapons, as well as training and technology to Hezbollah.
In recent years as Iran’s influence grew in the region and it strengthened its relations and power in Iraq and Syria, it seemed destined to control a swath of territory which would provide a physical link by land to the sea.
However, although Israeli and foreign experts warned about this “road to the sea,” few Iranian or Hezbollah officials discussed it openly. After Syrian regime soldiers reached the Iraqi border near Tanf and the PMU reached the Syrian border near Sinjar earlier this month, the ability of a physical “link-up” came closer to being fulfilled.
Netanyahu answers Hezbollah chief Nasrallah: We will aggressively retaliate to any attack
2. Hezbollah’s threat builds on the model used in Syria
In Syria a weakened regime has relied on foreign soldiers, many of them recruited by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps and Hezbollah’s fighters, to bolster its manpower shortages in the six-year war to defeat the rebellion.
These include thousands of recruits from Shia Hazara communities in Pakistan and Afghanistan. When Nasrallah specifically mentioned Afghanistan and Pakistan he was referencing these recruits which helped prop up Assad. Hezbollah has suffered thousands of casualties in Syria and it knows in any future war with Israel it lacks the manpower to fight the IDF. It makes up for that with a missile threat of some 100,000 missiles.
By bringing together an alliance of Shia militias throughout the region, Hezbollah hopes to make up for its loses in the Syrian conflict and use the successful model that saved Assad to save Hezbollah in any future war with Israel.
3.Nasrallah wants to drag Israel into a regional war with multiple states and provoke Russia and the US
Now Nasrallah is indicating that any future war with Israel will involve frontlines in Syria and Lebanon and that it has strategic depth that it never had in Lebanon, which is a small country, by relying on Shia militia allies from far and wide and the vastness of Syria and Iraq.
Hezbollah wants to drag Israel into a large conflict spanning a crescent from Beirut to Tehran, where Israel’s advantages, such as its air force and technology, will be less useful. Israel will be forced to contend with striking Hezbollah allies in Syria, Iraq and potentially Iran and Yemen, leading to a regional conflict.
Hezbollah hopes that Israel would be dragged in to attacking the Syrian regime that would provoke Russia. A previously acknowledged Israeli raid near Palmyra was challenged by Syrian air defenses. Russian “de-confliction” with Israel, that has worked well near the Golan, would not necessarily exist for Israel if it had to deal with enemies deeper in Syria.
Similarly the US would oppose any Israeli military activity confronting Shia militias in Iraq, who are part of the Iraqi government, which is allied with the US. The US has invested heavily in Baghdad’s central government and its prime minister Haider Abadi, involvement of Iraq’s Shia militias in a conflict with Israel would strain relations with Washington.
4.Nasrallah is engaged in a war of words with Israel
Israeli politicians and generals have been in a war of words with Hezbollah in the last months, trying to stave off a conflict that threatens to break out. At the Hezliya Conference at the Interdisciplinary Center on Wednesday IAF Commander Maj.-Gen. Amir Eshel said that Israel’s air force could crush Hezbollah in 48 hours. He claimed that Israel would do more damage in 48 hours than it did in 34 days in the 2006 Lebanon war. Education Minister Naftali Bennet said in March that a war with Hezbollah would involve all of Lebanon because Hezbollah is so deeply entwined with the Lebanese state.
Hezbollah has responded to these threats with threats of its own. Because Israel claims it can destroy Hezbollah infrastructure in Lebanon, Nasrallah is indicating that such a war won’t be so easy or go according to Israel’s plans.
The “surprise” in store for Israel, Nasrallah claims, is that up to 100,000 or more fighters will come from afar to aid Hezbollah. These numbers are likely exaggerated since the IRGC has only been able to recruit 30,000 fighters from Afghanistan and Pakistan to fight in Syria, and there are only 100,000 members of the PMU in Iraq, they can’t all be brought to the Golan to help Hezbollah. But even a small contingent of fighters coming from Iraq and Iran complicates a war with Hezbollah.
5.Silver lining?
Will the US wake up to the Shia militia threat in Iraq and will Nasrallah’s comments bring Israel closer to Saudi Arabia? The bombastic threats from Beirut mean that Israel’s common interests with Sunni Arab powers, such as the UAE and Saudi Arabia are once again reinforced.
Nasrallah’s mention of Yemen puts Israel on the same side as these governments who are fighting Houthi rebels in Yemen who are allied with Iran and Hezbollah.
The US supports the Iraqi government which includes Shia militias and which is close to Tehran. The statements by Nasrallah reveal the reality of the Iranian threat of a “road to the sea” and should encourage US policymakers to see the implications of the powerful PMU in Iraq. This means the US may finally wake up to the danger that Iranian influence in Iraq and beyond means in the post-ISIS era that is forming. Israeli policymakers and experts who have been warning the US about Iran for years, may find more open ears in Washington in the wake of Nasrallah’s comments.