The testimony of a traumatized terror victim - analysis

For Hamas, terrorism is a form of theater, and as former hostage Lifshitz revealed, they had rehearsed their tactics extensively.

Yocheved Lifshitz and Nurit Cooper (also known as Nurit Yitzhak) who were held hostages by Palestinian Hamas terrorists, are released by them, in this video screengrab obtained by Reuters on October 23, 2023. (photo credit: Al-Qassam Brigades via REUTERS)
Yocheved Lifshitz and Nurit Cooper (also known as Nurit Yitzhak) who were held hostages by Palestinian Hamas terrorists, are released by them, in this video screengrab obtained by Reuters on October 23, 2023.
(photo credit: Al-Qassam Brigades via REUTERS)

Can a woman whose husband is held hostage in Gaza be a reliable narrator of Hamas's underground tunnel city?

On Tuesday morning, the media converged at Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center to hear the harrowing testimony of Yocheved Lifshitz, an 85-year-old woman who Hamas abducted during the brutal massacre in Israel on October 7.

Lifshitz, a resident of Kibbutz Nir Oz, tragically witnessed the ruthless killing of her neighbors before she and her husband were forcibly removed from their home, transported on Hamas motorcycles, and thrust into the underground world of the organization.
“I have been to hell,” Lifshitz said on Tuesday morning, just hours after Hamas chose to release her and her 79-year-old neighbor, Nurit Cooper. Sitting in a gaunt and exhausted state in a wheelchair, the freed hostage spoke.
Can a woman who has been through hell, and whose husband is still held hostage in Gaza, be a reliable narrator of Hamas’s underground tunnel city? How much of Hamas’s psychological warfare is at play?
The media swarmed around the petite woman, bombarding her with questions as she struggled to recount her experience a mere 12 hours after her release and likely only a few hours after she arrived at Sourasky. Towards the end of her account, which included the disturbing details of being beaten with a wooden pole and forced to walk several kilometers through swampy tunnels, she acknowledged that she had received some medical care and food during her time under Hamas control.

She described the terrorists as “friendly in their way.”
“They went berserk in our kibbutz," Lifshitz said. "Masses stormed our homes, hit people, and kidnapped many. They did not care about kidnapping the elderly or children. It was extremely painful.”
She also said that “They told us they were Muslim and they would treat us well. They shared their food and ate with us.”
In an attempt to re-humanize Hamas, some international press members seized upon her concluding words. They drew comparisons between the same terrorist organization that abducted – and tortured – an 85-year-old woman and the likes of Mother Teresa.
Lifshitz endured two weeks in Hamas detention after terrorists wreaked havoc on her community, causing immense pain and trauma. The provision of “white cheese and cucumbers” cannot possibly compensate for the horrors she endured. World-renowned counterterrorism  expert Lt.-Col. (res.) Dr. Anat Berko rightly pointed out, “Hamas beheaded babies, raped women, and carried out mass killings. So, they gave her some vegetables and a kind doctor saw her daily. Does that make everything okay?
“It does not matter if we believe it,” she continued. “Something is wrong with this attitude.”
Furthermore, Lifshitz’s husband remains in captivity. Imagine her preparing to leave her captivity, with Hamas reminding her, “We have your husband.” Under such circumstances, anyone would be concerned about retribution on their loved ones, and every word Lifshitz utters must be seen in that context.

Berko stated, “She knows her husband is in their hands, and they are scrutinizing every step she takes and every word she says. Even if they did not threaten her with words, she knows they have her husband.”

The peak of psychological warfare

Hamas is widely recognized for using psychological warfare tactics, skillfully manipulating the narrative to its advantage. In numerous instances, The genocidal terrorist group has successfully portrayed themselves as victims, often exaggerating or fabricating civilian damage and scenes of suffering.

But as Dr. Irwin J. Mansdorf, a clinical psychologist and a fellow at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, wrote recently, “The images and descriptions of the initial Hamas attack that showed savage violence directed at civilians need to be the backdrop for providing an accurate perspective of future Israeli actions.”
For Hamas, terrorism is a form of theater, and as former hostage Lifshitz revealed, they had rehearsed their tactics extensively.
“They were prepared for this,” she said. “They were prepared for a very long time.”
Can the world unquestioningly accept Lifshitz’s heart-wrenching testimony as indisputable truth? In her words: “The story is not over until everyone comes back and we can start building something again.”