Obama administration will ignore ‘Israel-controlled territories’ in anti-BDS law

The language says that “discouraging” Israel boycotts would become one of the “principal negotiating objectives” of US officials.

US Presidnet Barack Obama in the Oval Office at the White House [File] (photo credit: REUTERS)
US Presidnet Barack Obama in the Oval Office at the White House [File]
(photo credit: REUTERS)
The Obama administration will ignore a provision in a new law targeting Israel boycotters that includes entities that boycott businesses in the West Bank settlements.
“By conflating Israel and ‘Israeli-controlled territories,’ a provision of the Trade Promotion Authority legislation runs counter to longstanding US policy towards the occupied territories, including with regard to settlement activity,” John Kirby, the State Department spokesman, said Tuesday in a statement.
The language Kirby referred to is in a trade measure signed into law on Monday that requires US negotiators to raise objections to Israel boycotts in their dealings.
The language, part of a broad Trade Promotion Authority passed by both chambers of Congress and signed this week by Obama, says that “discouraging” Israel boycotts would become one of the “principal negotiating objectives” of US officials.
It also explicitly includes “persons doing business in Israel or in Israeli-controlled territories” as illegitimate targets for boycotts.
Liberal pro-Israel groups, including J Street and Americans for Peace Now, objected to that provision, saying that for the first time it would confer US recognition of Israeli sovereignty in the West Bank.
The bill was otherwise backed by an array of pro-Israel groups, led by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. The bill’s drafters include Sens. Ben Cardin, D-Md., and Rob Portman, R-Ohio, and US Reps. Peter Roskam, R-Ill., and Juan Vargas, D-Calif.
Kirby said the Obama administration would continue to firmly oppose any boycotts of Israel, but would not abide by the clause referring to “Israeli-controlled territories.”
“The US government has never defended or supported Israeli settlements and activity associated with them and, by extension, does not pursue policies or activities that would legitimize them,” he said.
Abiding by the clause referring to the territories could compromise trade dealings with countries in Europe, many of which discourage boycotts of Israel within its 1967 lines but where there is also a range of policies governing how and whether to do business with Israeli companies operating in the West Bank.