The Tweet was a response to the most recent gaffe by US Vice President Joe Biden, who told a largely African American crowd on the campaign trail: “They're going to put y'all back in chains.” Biden, of course, responded that the Republicans were overly-focused on negativity instead of substance, and even mentioned the Tweet with disdain: “I'm told that when I made that comment earlier today in Danville, Virginia, the Romney campaign put out a tweet. You know, tweets these days? Put out a tweet, went on the airwaves saying, 'Biden, he's outrageous in saying that,' ...If you want to know what's outrageous, it's their policies and the effects of their policies on middle class America. That's what's outrageous.”In a subsequent campaign speech, Romney said of the campaign, “Mr. President, take your campaign of division and anger and hate back to Chicago.” But whether or not the pundits and politicians would like to say that campaign meanness has reached new levels, former Democratic aide Blake Zeff points out in BuzzFeed that nastiness is part and parcel of all recent campaigns. “This false claim,” he says of the notion that the campaign has hit a new lows “is a quadrennial tradition, frequently raised by struggling campaigns, as predictable as it is unsubstantiable,” providing ample reminders from 2004 and 2008 for comparison.When it comes to mud-slinging campaign nastiness, however, the past two presidential elections set the bar rather low.Mr. President, take your campaign of division and anger and hate back to Chicago mi.tt/N4dilX
— Mitt Romney (@MittRomney) August 15, 2012
#USelections2012 offers weekly insight into the US presidential election through a social media lens, tracking candidates as they try to reach 270 electoral votes in 140 characters or less.
The writer is a Breaking News editor and blogger at The Jerusalem Post. Read his blog ‘The Bottom Line’ here.