Dead Sea Dilemma

The hotels on the southwest shore of the Dead Sea might be forced to be torn down and rebuilt further away, as evaporation ponds threaten to flood them.

Dead sea hotels (photo credit: Yossi Zamir FLASH 90)
Dead sea hotels
(photo credit: Yossi Zamir FLASH 90)
Drive along the Dead Sea nowadays and you cannot help but notice that the lowest point on Earth is sinking ever lower. If you are paying a first visit to the area, you might be puzzled as to why the Ein Gedi spa is so far from the shoreline that you need a shuttle to reach the beach – until you realize that it was originally built right at the shore, and over the years the water has receded. Continue your drive to the southern basin of the Dead Sea, however, and strangely enough the hotels there are complaining of exactly the opposite: the water level has been rising so fast that they fear that within a few short years their lobbies will be flooded.
The threat to 16 hotels at Ein Boqeq, which cater mainly to a clientele of European tourists who travel to the area for the therapeutic qualities of the Dead Sea’s mineral-rich waters, has become so acute that a government committee was formed to determine what is to be done to save the hotels. The government’s decision, as announced by Environmental Protection Minister Gilad Erdan and Tourism Minister Stas Misezhnikov in early June, is to harvest the salt accumulation at the bottom of the Dead Sea’s southern basin, at an estimated cost of 7 billion shekels (approx. $2 billion).
That decision, which was applauded by environmental groups, has now led to a new controversy: who will foot the bill.
Understanding how all this came about requires considering some history. The Dead Sea is a dead-end for waters flowing from the Sea of Galilee by way of the Jordan River. But the Sea of Galilee has been pumped for decades to provide drinking water, which has been keenly felt downstream, as the waters feeding into the Dead Sea have been reduced to a trickle. That, in turn, has led to a sharp drop in the Dead Sea’s water level in its northern basin, at an estimated rate of 1.2 meters per year.
The southern basin, according to geological experts, would have long ago disappeared entirely. But that would have meant shutting down the Dead Sea Works, a company that is the world’s fourth largest producer of potash, which it extracts from the salty lake along with magnesium chloride and other minerals. To maintain the southern basin, channels carry water from the northern basin to the southern basin, which begins a bit south of where Masada looms over the shoreline.
The mineral extraction process used by the Dead Sea Works, however, has a by-product: salt that slowly accumulates along the bottom of the lake. It may seem at first glance that salt accumulation in the Dead Sea, which is nearly nine times as saline as the Atlantic and Pacific oceans in any case, would be insignificant. But so much salt has been gathered at the bottom – several meters high by now – that the water level in the southern basin has steadily crept up, at a rate of 20 centimeters a year. Unless something is done, the waters could literally flood into hotel lobbies as early as 2017.
The Dead Sea Preservation Government Company, a branch of the Tourism Ministry, commissioned a committee to produce a scientific study to determine how to solve the problem, which was delivered earlier this year. The committee considered three alternatives.
The first proposal to build a lagoon for water drainage was discarded early on because of its potentially negative ecological effects. That left either mining the salt out of the Dead Sea, or knocking down the hotels to rebuild them on higher ground, ideas that had been mooted for several years.
Based on straightforward cost comparison, moving the hotels would actually be the less expensive option; a hotel rebuilding project is estimated as costing between three to four billion shekels (about $1 billion), only half as much as a salt harvest. But the committee recommended salt removal, regarding the accumulated salt to be de facto industrial waste produced by the Dead Sea Works, which therefore has the responsibility of cleaning up the waste.
The committee’s recommendations were accepted by the government, putting the Dead Sea Works on the defensive, after its spokesmen said that the company cannot afford to pay for a $2 billion cleanup effort on its own. In an effort to boost its public image as it prepares to fight the decision, the company has launched a public relations campaign of advertisements claiming that the mineral industry has been primarily responsible for reviving life and settlement in the southern Dead Sea region.
If a compromise between the Dead Sea Works and the government on who will foot the immense salt harvest bill is not reached by negotiations, the issue could end in a court case, taking years to resolve. Then the question may be which will come first – a final decision on the matter, or the first floods in the hotels along the southern basin of the Dead Sea.