Schulz faux pas: The liquid aftermath in the German press

Schulz defended his statements, with Der Spiegel noting surprising, clear-cut language from the envoy, who did not see any reason to apologize to “Israeli hard-liners.”

By ANDREAS BERGGREN
Parliamentary leader of Germany's Social Democratic Party (SPD) Thomas Oppermann (L) chats with party fellow Martin Schulz before a party board meeting in Berlin February 17, 2014. (photo credit: REUTERS)
Parliamentary leader of Germany's Social Democratic Party (SPD) Thomas Oppermann (L) chats with party fellow Martin Schulz before a party board meeting in Berlin February 17, 2014.
(photo credit: REUTERS)
When European Parliament President Martin Schulz stated erroneous statistics on water allocation in the Knesset last Tuesday – claiming Palestinians are given 17 liters of water per day compared to 70 for Israelis – Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and other MKs did not mince words while pointing out his misstep. “[Schulz] suffers from the same selective listening as many Europeans,” Netanyahu said in response. While the EP president’s figures were wrong, the general statement – the inequality of water distribution – was correct. Therefore, German media last week entered a numbers and analysis competition, with the daily papers of Die Zeit, Die Welt and Der Spiegel fighting for who could produce the most enlightening statistics.
On Wednesday, Schulz defended his statements, with Der Spiegel noting surprising, clear-cut language from the envoy, who did not see any reason to apologize to “Israeli hard-liners.”
“At the Knesset I was required to explain the stance of the European Parliament. Obviously I can’t just say things that please everybody, I’m also obliged to express contested matters,” he said to Die Welt on Wednesday. In Der Spiegel, he added: “The Israeli settlements are illegal according to the Geneva Conventions, but also very real,” and emphasized the necessity of practical solutions.
This straight talk resonated with Die Zeit columnist Gisela Dachs, who argued from Jerusalem that this latest commotion is a sign of rising tension between Israel and the EU, writing that there is a real fear in Israel that the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement could gain more momentum if the peace talks, led by US Secretary of State John Kerry, fail.
The water controversy continued into the headlines on Thursday of last week, with Der Spiegel leading their paper with “Where Schulz is right,” arguing that despite the factual error, his overall remark was correct.
The paper acknowledges the controversy as to the numbers and presents a walkthrough for its readers.
The factual voyage points out two main currents: Lack of Palestinian infrastructure, and the role of (economically beneficial) Israeli crop cultivation.
Die Welt chose the word “negligence” to describe the Schulz statement. Its fact check was distinctly more responsive to Israel, noting that the country is a world leader in water technology. Die Zeit, on the other hand, opted for a literary ruse: the divide in water access and, likewise, a divide between Israeli settlements (where soil literally flourishes) and the dry, arid Palestinian soil (where water heaters on top of Palestine rooftops are nowhere to be seen). The newspaper also points out that these particular figures are highly politically motivated, and lands softly with the same conclusion as Der Spiegel: Israel’s cutting-edge agricultural technology and Palestine’s lack of basic infrastructure are two big reasons for the divide.
IN OTHER NEWS FROM EUROPE
Jews, Homosexuals, Blacks, Roma, Muslims: The Extension of Hatred
Mediapart, France, February 14
The profitable, left-leaning paper – which was created in 2008 as a reaction to budget cuts by a former editor-in-chief of Le Monde – published an analysis last Friday of anti-Semitism as a part of a new kind of overarching intolerance in France, an all-inclusive xenophobia exemplified by attacks on a mosque and on Roma. The article concluded that French society is plagued by homophobia and anti-Semitic undercurrents, noting that it seems France is still unable to cope with problems of social cohesion.
An Interactive Map Of Deported Jews In France
Le Monde, France, February 14
On Friday, the paper presented a uniquely interactive map. Shaped like a hexagon, the map’s bubbles displayed the names of Jewish children deported between 1942 and 1944, a time when more than 11,400 children were deported. The interactive figure provided categories of children, communes, addresses and names under a neat scroll-menu, applicable to many French cities as Marseille, Paris and Nice; there was also a free search option to find the name of a missing child. The map was created by historian Jean-Luc Pinol, who presented it as part of an art show at the National Conservatory of Arts and Crafts, in Paris.
Sephardi Jews Are Longing For Something, But Not To Return El Pais, Spain, February 15 After the Spanish prime minister’s decision to offer Spanish passports to Sephardi Jews living in Israel whose ancestors were expelled in the 1492 inquisition, the paper published an interview on Saturday with one such Sephardi Jew, who said he is not considering moving to Spain – nor are many others like him. “I am too proud to stop being only Israeli. I love Spain and my roots are there, but I would never abandon Israel. The Spanish government’s gesture is nice, but we do not understand the country; they are pro-Arab, and it hurts me to see how they treat the State of Israel.” The Sephardi Jews have a deep-rooted connection to Jerusalem, as expressed in many songs of their unique language – Ladino, a true linguistic phenomenon influenced by a stunning variety of languages in the world.
Hyper Connected Soldiers – Prohibited Cellular Phones
La Stampa, Italy, February 15
An article discusses how IDF soldiers’ phone habits have changed with the revolution of smartphones, and become a problem for the army. The previous directives given to soldiers date from a pre-smartphone age. Lt.-Col. Oren Avraham, responsible for IDF military discipline, has become a leading figure in the banning of smartphone use, as their arrival has resulted in a disciplinary gray area in which there have been incidents of inappropriate pictures taken by soldiers while on duty. Avraham tells the daily that the changes “are the result of coordination with legal counsel regarding privacy and rights.”