It doesn’t take too much to imagine what took place on October 7 in the mind of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. His whole strategy toward the Palestinians was in tatters. His grand schemes for the country were revealed as hollow utterances from the mouth of a false prophet. Besides October 7 being a catastrophic failure of Israeli intelligence, Hamas had dealt a personal blow to Israel’s chief. It was not only a public humiliation; it was an affront to his carefully molded persona.

His response was impulsive; it was at a gut level, not that of a measured, rational leader. Unfortunately, there was no one who would disagree with him. He had rid himself of all his critics and potential rivals for his office, putting in place individuals who were even more radical than he, younger politicians who lacked the deviousness of their leader. On that surprising morning in October, did anyone come forward with an opposite strategy? Did anyone suggest that they might parley with the enemy, offering to free any number of Palestinians in Israeli jails for the release of the hostages? Could this not have played out as a quid pro quo and prevented the massive loss of lives in the war, on both sides? 

Read More