Oren disputes Rhodes’ account of Israeli reaction to delaying Syria strikes

In 2013, Obama sought to attack Syrian President Assad’s positions in response to his use of chemical weapons against civilians. The attacks, delayed at first, were never carried out.

June 5, 2018 21:23
1 minute read.
Michael Oren

Former ambassador to the US Michael Oren. (photo credit: WIKIMEDIA COMMONS/ANNE MANDLEBAUM)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Israel regarded former US president Barack Obama’s decision to wait for a Congressional vote before launching air strikes in Syria with great concern, former ambassador to the US Michael Oren said on Tuesday, disputing the version of events written by Ben Rhodes, a former senior aide to Obama.

In 2013, Obama sought to attack Syrian President Bashar Assad’s positions in response to his use of chemical weapons against civilians, but he asked Congress to vote on it first, delaying the strikes – which in the end were never carried out.

Rhodes, then Obama’s deputy national security adviser for strategic communications, wrote in his new book that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was among several world leaders Obama called to update them on his decision to wait for a vote. In an excerpt published by The Atlantic, Rhodes relates that Netanyahu told Obama that “your decision was right, and history will be kinder than public opinion.”

But Oren, now Deputy Minister for Diplomacy, said that while he was not on the phone with Netanyahu and Obama during that conversation, what Rhodes wrote does not reflect Israel’s position at the time.

“People say all kinds of things on the phone,” he said. “We were very concerned. No one will tell you we thought it was a good move.”

In fact, Oren said, he was so shocked by Obama’s decision, that he cut himself while shaving when he heard about it.
“We were surprised and concerned,” he recalled, a primary concern being Israel’s “ability to defend ourselves from chemical weapons. If America isn’t responding, does that mean we shouldn’t respond?”

Oren said he spent much of that week trying to convince the White House to add a line about Israel’s right to defend itself into a speech Obama was planning to give on the situation with Syria.

The former ambassador said that he had “thought that maybe Congress would understand” Israel’s position, but the negative reaction was “overwhelming. I don’t know if Obama anticipated that.”

Oren also lamented the “theater of the absurd” of the Obama administration’s attempts to convince Congress to approve the attacks, citing then-secretary of state John Kerry telling Congress “it’ll be so small you can’t imagine, a pinprick.
“It’s silly. That’s not how you want a superpower to act if you’re its ally,” Oren said.

Related Content

Yechiel Leiter at 2019 Jerusalem Post Annual Conference.
June 18, 2019
Moving coexistence towards success


Cookie Settings