I am puzzled.  I found an article that argued very forcefully that Jesus, if he were on Earth today and a citizen of the United States, would, without a doubt, vote for the Democratic Party candidate for President. Shortly afterwards, I came upon an article that argued just as certainly the opposite: that Jesus, as an American, would be sure to vote Republican.  Doubtless, if I had the time, I could find a Green Party Jesus and a Libertarian Party Jesus.  PETA, the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, is convinced that Jesus would be a vegetarian.



            It reminds me very much of the so-called “search for the historical Jesus” of which the Jesus Seminar is the current media darling.  Albert Schweitzer (1875-1965) was one of the first of that merry bunch back in the late nineteenth century.  He even wrote a book entitled, The Search for the Historical Jesus.  The one thing that has been said of such research is that the searchers inevitably wind up, unsurprisingly,  finding out that Jesus looks very like themselves in a mirror.  He has their attitudes, their beliefs, and their approach to life.  The search tells us little about Jesus, but a lot about those on the hunt.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


            So it is, it seems to me, with those who want to convince me that Jesus would vote a certain way.  Remarkably, Jesus seems to always vote exactly the way the author of the article would vote.  As someone said, we have a tendency to make the gods in our own image.



            I think it is nonsensical, foolish and insufferably arrogant to suggest that a historical figure would vote or argue a certain way on a modern question, a question of which the individual in view never considered nor made any pronouncements on.  To try to extrapolate from what they did say to how we think they’d argue today about a given topic, it seems to me, is remarkably presumptuous. 

            How can we be certain we understand and know a historical figure well enough to be able to put words in his or her mouth?  Though the little bracelets that some wear, with the initials, WWJD, standing for the phrase “What would Jesus Do?” are harmless and designed to keep their wearers from misbehaving, they remain, in my mind at least, a bit peculiar. 

First, do you really need to literally wear your conscience on your sleeve?  And second, do you really know Jesus well enough to be certain what he’d think about you eating that doughnut instead of the bran muffin?  Then why imagine we can tell how he’d vote?  Especially, considering that our vote is supposed to be private.  Do you think he’d even tell us who he picked?

And besides, does it really matter?  In a first century letter that the apostle Paul wrote to the church in Rome, he writes, “there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God.”  (Romans 13:1).  If that’s the case, then God chooses who the rulers will be anyhow.  So how would Jesus vote?  Just look at the election results the day after and find out.


Relevant to your professional network? Please share on Linkedin
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this blog article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or viewpoint of The Jerusalem Post. Blog authors are NOT employees, freelance or salaried, of The Jerusalem Post.

Think others should know about this? Please share