Robotic surgery not always most advanced, say researchers

Rambam doctors: Laparoscopic approach can be equal

By
November 5, 2015 00:33
1 minute read.
doctor

Doctor [Illustrative]. (photo credit: INGIMAGE)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

While the use of robotic surgery has increased significantly here, especially in the fields of gynecology, ear-nose-and throat, general surgery and urology, there is no conclusive evidence that the technique has advantages over the laparoscopic (keyhole) approach.

Instead, argue Rambam Medical Center researchers, it appears that market power and the desire to be at the forefront of technology drive many hospitals to purchase the robot and train doctors in its use.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


So say Drs. Emad Matanes, Sari Boulus and Lior Lowenstein of the obstetrics and gynecology department at the Haifa medical center, writing in the latest issue of the Israel Medical Association Journal (IMAJ).

Robot surgery was first carried out 30 years ago, and it has evolved gradually and significantly over the last decade, they write.

The idea was taken from the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s use of robotics to enable the treatment of soldiers on the battlefield without endangering medical staffers. The US Food and Drug Administration approved the first surgical robot in 1993. Since 2011, hundreds of articles have been published on the “theoretical and practical aspects” of surgical robotics.

The Rambam doctors noted that the cost of surgical robots is very high, the amount of space they take up in the operating theater is very large, much disposable equipment has to be purchased and the cost of maintenance is significant.

Between 2008 and 2013, six robots were bought – by the Hadassah Medical Organization, Rambam, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center and Assuta Medical Centers.



By 2013, there were 150 surgeons in Israel who had trained to use the da Vinci surgical system. Of those, 104 were listed in a database as robotic surgeons.

That same year, 975 robotic surgeries were performed, about half by urologists to remove diseased prostate glands and the rest to remove uteruses, reconstruct pelvic floors, take out benign smooth-muscle growths and perform other operations.

Meta-analyses on the subject, however, showed “a lack of hard evidence for greater efficiency compared to laparoscopy,” the authors said.

They “presume that the robot will undergo many improvements to increase cost-efficiency...

but the advantages of robotic over laparoscopic surgery have yet to be demonstrated in every field, and the issue of cost must be examined thoroughly... The forces of the market seem to exceed those of evidence-based medicine,” they concluded.

Related Content

A neurosurgeon looks through an eyepiece on the KINEVO 900 microscope at Hadassah Ein Kerem
July 11, 2018
Hadassah Ein Kerem to use world’s most advanced microscope

By OREN OPPENHEIM