Israeli market made gas monopoly probable, says BOI report

The battle over how to regulate the companies extracting gas from Israel's reserves has been a long and bruising one, and has gone all the way to the Supreme Court.

March 15, 2016 19:40
1 minute read.
tamar gas

Tamar gas field‏. (photo credit: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM/THE JERUSALEM POST)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


A Bank of Israel report released Tuesday found that circumstances specific to Israel's gas market made the formation of a monopoly highly likely.

"An analysis of the developments leading up to the discovery of the Tamar and Leviatan reservoirs indicates that the formation of a monopoly in the natural gas production sector reflects, to a large extent, the difficulty in raising funds and recruiting top-tier operators for deep sea exploration in Israel," the report, written by BOI senior economist Yoav Friedmann said.

"In such a situation, when few reservoirs are found, there is a considerable probability that they will be held by one of those operators."

The battle over how to regulate the companies extracting gas from Israel's reserves has been a long and bruising one, and has gone all the way to the Supreme Court.

The analysis critiqued the extent of the political fist-swinging over the gas, arguing that a certain level of back-and-forth over regulation made for better policy, but too much infighting had negative repercussions on Israel's business environment.

In moderation, reorienting policy in favor of the public at the expense of investers was positive, the paper said.

"When such a policy is conducted in moderation, and with taking into account the entrepreneurs’ investment considerations ex ante—an approach that was reflected in, for example, adopting the conclusions of the Sheshinski Committee to increase taxation on profits in the industry—it is not out of line in an international comparison and is likely to be beneficial to the citizens over the long term as well," Friedmann wrote.

"However, making numerous decisions that adversely impact entrepreneurs is liable to negatively impact investment in the industry," he added.

Some onerous regulation, such as demanding that the smaller Tanin and Karish reservoirs be oriented toward domestic sales only, made it less likely that they would be developed at all.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Workers strike outside of the Teva building in Jerusalem, December 2017
December 18, 2017
Workers make explosive threats as massive Teva layoff strikes continue