Ethics @ Work: Ethics & governance in times of crisis

Good regulation reinforces market discipline.

By ASHER MEIR
March 26, 2009 21:39
3 minute read.
Ethics @ Work: Ethics & governance in times of crisis

asher meir 88. (photo credit: )

On Wednesday, the Business Ethics Center of Jerusalem sponsored a major conference on the topic of "Ethics and governance in times of crisis." There were panels and lectures on a wide variety of topics, but virtually every session touched on the question of to what extent is more regulation the proper response to the crisis. While there was no consensus, I think most participants would agree that some additional regulation would be helpful, but not the micromanagement kind where the regulators get into your kishkes. One point I want to emphasize is that believing there should have been more regulation before the crisis doesn't mean that we need more now. Former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan acknowledged in his testimony before Congress that the extensive deregulation of the past decades was, in hindsight, a mistake. But in nearly the same breath he stated that the lessons of the recent crash would do far more to correct the excesses than any regulation could. It would have been nice if a regulator had made us lock the barn door before the horse escaped, but now that we survey the situation, his input is a bit superfluous. Micromanaging Here are some consequences of ineffective, micromanaging regulation mentioned by conference participants: • Expensive: Prof. Yossi Gross said the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which passed in response to the Enron scandal, had cost US corporations more than $1 trillion. (Others challenge this figure, but no one disputes that it is a burdensome law.) • Counterproductive: Lawyer Ilana Bar suggested that legislation requiring directors to compare salaries of senior executives to those in comparable firms was responsible for aggravating the degree of salary competition. Others said Sarbanes-Oxley had caused many public companies to go private to avoid the onerous regulations. Dorit Selinger of Maalot said excessive regulation might take the pressure off companies to police themselves. • Superfluous: Migdal director Shlomo Hendel said requiring that boards review financial reports was hardly needed. • Easily evaded: You can't put a cop on every corner, or a regulator in every cubicle. If the regulator tries to micromanage, the company will always be one step ahead. Worthy goals Yet regulation - sometimes even extensive regulation - is still a necessity. The reason is simple: People always have a tendency to act in a way that is expedient, short-sighted and sometimes just plain crooked if no is looking over their shoulder. Here are some worthy goals of regulation: • Transparency: Securities Authority legal counsel Shoni Albeck said most of the new regulations the Authority wants to promulgate are not going to tell companies what to do, but they would ensure that the companies tell investors what they are doing. The pressure for good governance will come from the shareholders, not the regulator, but only if the regulator forces them to be transparent. • Honesty: After you compel disclosure, regulators should then make sure that people are doing what they say they're doing. It's disgraceful that no regulator discovered that for decades Bernie Madoff was not carrying out the trades he reported - something that was relatively simple to check. • Accountability: You don't have to tell people what to do, but you can make them pay for their mistakes. Albeck said directors would lose sleep worrying about lawsuits when they know they acted in a questionable fashion. Conversely, rewarding ethical conduct - for example, the US Federal Sentencing Guidelines, which reduce fines for companies with effective ethics programs - can be effective. • Uniformity: Sometimes it doesn't much matter what you do, as long as everybody does the same thing. When there is a need for standards, regulators can play an important role. Market discipline alone is not going to make managers act in the best interest of shareholders and the public. Public oversight, in the form of regulation, is a vital necessity for market functioning. But regulation alone is also not going to do the job. The best combination is when regulation helps empower shareholders, by giving them knowledge about companies and power to hold their leadership accountable for lapses. The best regulation reinforces market discipline. ethics-at-work@besr.org Asher Meir is research director at the Business Ethics Center of Jerusalem (www.besr.org), an independent institute in the Jerusalem Institute of Technology.


Related Content

The Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
April 30, 2015
Teva doubles down on Mylan, despite rejection

By GLOBES, NIV ELIS

Israel Weather
  • 15 - 23
    Beer Sheva
    17 - 21
    Tel Aviv - Yafo
  • 12 - 18
    Jerusalem
    15 - 21
    Haifa
  • 19 - 27
    Elat
    16 - 27
    Tiberias