Your taxes: How to improve tax-break policy

It isn’t reasonable that some parts of the population groan under the tax burden and the cost of living, while large companies enjoy sweeping tax breaks.

By LEON HARRIS
October 22, 2013 23:55
4 minute read.
Isreli currency.

Money cash Shekels currency 521. (photo credit: Reuters)

Earlier this month, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., the generic-drug manufacturer, announced plans to lay off around 5,000 employees worldwide, including some in Israel. This triggered a storm of protest not only from the employees themselves but also from politicians, the Histadrut and others.

They figured a company that has enjoyed substantial Israeli tax breaks over the years has to think twice before creating unemployment. Even State Comptroller Yosef Shapira reportedly concurred with this and said the layoffs were inappropriate.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


Later it was announced that Teva had blinked, and it will now consult the Histadrut before deciding on Israeli layoffs.

Shapira went on to publish his annual report for 2013. In it is a highly critical section on how the government decides its fiscal policy.

According to the State Comptroller’s Report, the process of taking decisions in the Treasury about taxes is defective, isn’t based on orderly staff work that includes the presentation of alternatives, and it isn’t properly documented.

Also, it isn’t reasonable that some parts of the population groan under the tax burden and the cost of living, while large companies enjoy sweeping tax breaks.

Now, we know in general terms what the problem is in Israel, but how can things be improved? On October 10, the OECD published a new report on fiscal incentives entitled “Supporting Investment in Knowledge Capital, Growth and Innovation.” Israel joined the OECD in 2010.



According to the OECD, most of its member governments use tax incentives to encourage businesses to invest in research and development (R&D) to boost innovation and drive economic growth. Others, such as China, India and South Africa, are doing the same. But reforming these incentives would give countries a better return on their investment and support young innovative firms that play a crucial role in job creation.

It seems Israel should also take note.

In fact, the report says over a third of all public support for business R&D in the OECD is via tax incentives. Multinational enterprises (MNEs) benefit the most, as they can use taxplanning strategies to maximize their support for innovation.

This can create an unlevel playing field that disadvantages purely domestic and young firms, the OECD says.

“Much more needs to be done to help young firms play a greater role in driving innovation and creating jobs,” said Andrew Wyckoff, the OECD’s director of science, technology and industry. “They are the future of the knowledge economy and need the same chance to succeed as the major players.

Improving their access to finance and making the tax rules fair for everyone is key.”

The tax rules that enable MNEs to shift offshore profits from intellectual assets, such as patents, are already being reviewed as part of the OECD’s Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. The OECD also recommends that governments review their R&D tax-incentive schemes. This is to reduce the risk of forgoing significant tax revenues in their drive to boost investment without a commensurate rise in innovation in their economy.

Important aspects of tax schemes that should be reviewed, according to the OECD, include the scope of eligible R&D, the firms that qualify and the treatment of large R&D performers.

This is important because in many countries the current schemes may be more costly than intended. Tax relief has become more generous in recent years, and the full cost is not always transparent because these incentives are considered “off budget” as a tax expenditure.

Helping start-up firms is crucial: Evidence from 15 OECD countries suggests that these firms generated nearly half of all new jobs over the past decade, despite accounting for only about 20 percent of total business-sector jobs, excluding finance. These firms – five years of age or less – often do not generate enough profit to make use of tax incentives. Better policies to help them would be cash refunds, carry forwards or the use of payroll withholding-tax credits for R&D-related wages.

OECD analysis also suggests that well-designed direct support, such as grants and contracts, may be more effective in stimulating R&D than previously thought, especially for startups.

Intellectual property rules also need updating, especially to avoid an erosion of patent quality. Greater mutual recognition and comparability of rules internationally would help.

To sum up, Israel can learn a thing or two from the OECD.

In particular, tax breaks should be spread more evenly between large companies and start-ups. Government grants and contracts should be added to the incentive pot. And the Treasury’s decision-making process should be improved.

As always, consult experienced tax advisers in each country at an early stage in specific cases.

leon@hcat.co Leon Harris is a certified public accountant and tax specialist at Harris Consulting & Tax Ltd.


Related Content

The Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
April 30, 2015
Teva doubles down on Mylan, despite rejection

By GLOBES, NIV ELIS