Court asks IDF to explain barrier route decision

High Court orders state to explain why it didn't nullify or change security barrier route through Nahal Refaim in West Bank.

By
May 3, 2013 04:03
1 minute read.
A section of the security barrier near Givat Ze'ev

security barrier 311. (photo credit: Courtesy)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

The High Court of Justice on Thursday ordered the IDF to defend its decision to route the security barrier through the West Bank’s Nahal Refaim Valley and issued an injunction against further work on the barrier.

It asked the state to explain why it had not nullified or changed the barrier’s route, and to explain why the barrier could not be reconfigured.

It gave the IDF, through the state, until July 2 to respond.

“This is a precedent case...the injunction granted by the High Court forces the military to reconsider their presumption that security concerns tramp all other issues,” said Gidon Bromberg, Israeli director of Friends of the Earth Middle East.

FoEME, along with the Nature and Parks Authority as well as the Palestinian village of Battir, which is located in the valley, had petitioned the court against the barrier.

FoEME had told the court that placing the barrier in the valley would destroy an ancient agricultural system that includes terraces, pools and small canals.


The IDF, in turn, had suggested that it could place a fence in the valley, rather than a concrete wall.

But FoEME had argued that the fence would similarly harm the site’s integrity and its ancient farming system.

The Palestinian Authority has placed the site on its tentative list of places that it wants to register on UNESCO’s World Heritage List.

The IDF has said that the barrier is needed to complete the security ring around Jerusalem to prevent suicide bombing attacks. It is also concerned about the safety of a nineteenth-century rail line that goes through the valley and is still operational.

In its court response, FoEME said it believed that the line would be stopped within the next five years, because of the nation’s new rail system.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

idf hebron
August 22, 2014
Palestinians throw Molotov cocktail at IDF checkpoint in Hebron

By KHALED ABU TOAMEH, TOVAH LAZAROFF