Questions remain regarding the opening of Vatican WWII-era archives

Researchers may have to investigate the archives for several years before coming to any conclusions.

By
March 4, 2019 23:23
2 minute read.
President Reuven Rivlin meets with Pope Francis at the Vatican on Thursday, November 15, 2018

President Reuven Rivlin meets with Pope Francis at the Vatican on Thursday, November 15, 2018. (photo credit: KOBI GIDEON/GPO)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

The role of Pope Pius XII during the Holocaust has been one of the most sensitive issues in Catholic-Jewish relations ever since the end of World War II. On the one hand, the pope’s supporters, inside and outside the Vatican, have pointed to the rescue of many Jews in monasteries and convents in Rome and elsewhere in Europe, coupled with praise for such activities by Jewish leaders.


They also note that the pope intervened on behalf of Hungarian Jews in 1944, a step which proved helpful in stopping the deportations to Auschwitz.
On the other hand, many Jewish and non-Jewish historians and Jewish organizations emphasized his failure to specifically condemn the persecution and mass murder of European Jews, and unequivocally denounce Nazism and the Third Reich. They were also critical of the fact that Pius XII did not explicitly instruct Catholic priests and their followers to refrain from aiding the Nazis in their pursuit of the Jews.


In this regard, the situation differed from country to country, but there is little doubt that in those areas with a high percentage of devout Catholics, such an intervention by the pope could have proven extremely beneficial. It certainly was the case in places where Catholic priests were extremely influential, such as in Slovakia, whose head of state Jozef Tiso was a Catholic priest, and in Croatia where the local church’s support for the genocidal Ustashe regime was notable.


What made this debate particularly frustrating, especially for the pope’s detractors, was the fact that there was no free access to the Vatican archives, a situation that was only strengthened by those critical of Pius XII’s record.


Thus, the decision yesterday by Pope Francis to open the secret Vatican archives was welcomed by many Jewish institutions and organizations, especially those that deal with the Holocaust and Jewish-Catholic relations. Assuming that none of the documents that reflect negatively on the pope and the Catholic Church have been laundered, this step will allow historians to answer the four key questions that will determine how history will view the role of Pius XII, and whether or not he will be declared a saint.


The first of these questions asks what details reached Pius regarding the persecution and murder of the Jews throughout Europe, and whether the information arrived in the Vatican from sources considered reliable by Pius and his close circle. In this regard, the correspondence of the papal nuncios (the Vatican’s “ambassadors”) in European countries that were satellite states of Nazi Germany, will be critical. 


The second question asks when did this information reach Rome? Was there still time to influence the fate of the Jewish communities, or had they already been either murdered or deported to death camps? 


Assuming that the pope was informed with reliable details of the Final Solution, the third question asks what was his practical response? Did he do something positive that was unknown? And the final question relates to the actual scope of his assistance to Jews; will such details shed light and yield new and unknown information?


It will take at least a few years until we know the answers to all these questions, but they will prove of critical importance in the future of Jewish-Catholic relations.


The writer is the director of the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s Israel office and Eastern European affairs coordinator, and is a SWC Nazi war crimes researcher worldwide.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Caribbean
July 19, 2019
Chabad couple detail life as full-time members of Aruba's Jewish Community

By ZACHARY KEYSER

Cookie Settings