New Jersey towns sued for legislation that 'discriminates' against Jews

The frontrunner in the state’s gubernatorial race also criticized the towns’ actions in an op-ed in a local Jewish newspaper.

October 25, 2017 16:33
1 minute read.
Eruv construction



Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Three New Jersey towns are being sued for legislating against the construction of an eruv,  the artificial boundary that, according to Jewish law, allows Jews to push and carry objects outside their homes on the Sabbath and holy days, within their borders.

The frontrunner in the state’s gubernatorial race also criticized the towns’ actions in an op-ed in a local Jewish newspaper.

A few New Jersey towns on the border with New York have been trying for months to prevent the construction of an eruv, which in many cases is meant to accommodate Jews in the neighboring New York villages.

One of the border towns, Mahwah, passed ordinances prohibiting out-of-state residents from using its parks and prohibiting the construction of some materials necessary for the eruvs’ construction. The state of New Jersey has sued Mahwah over the ordinances, which it says illegally target Jews, according to a report Tuesday in the Associated Press.

Another lawsuit from the Eruv Association, which puts up and maintains the eruv, targets Mahwah and the nearby towns of Upper Saddle River and Montvale for illegally inhibiting Jews from practicing their religion, according to the Bergen Record.

Some New Jersey residents have objected to the eruvs on the grounds that they were constructed extra-legally, while also voicing concerns that an increase in haredi Orthodox residents could mean a change in the towns’ character or a defunding of local services many haredi families do not use, like the public school system.

Jewish residents contend that these concerns are anti-Semitic, and say the eruv was constructed legally. Accusations of antisemitism were bolstered by Phil Murphy, a financier and former ambassador to Germany under President Obama, who is the Democratic nominee for governor of New Jersey. He wrote an op-ed in the New Jersey Jewish Standard accusing the towns of creating an “overarching perception of antisemitism and discrimination.”

“Sadly, not all of Mahwah’s residents embrace tolerance,” he wrote on October 19. “When claims are made in public forums that a particular group ‘destroys’ the local tax base upon entry, there is a problem. When a Holocaust survivor at a public meeting is heckled, and then denounced as a fraud, there is a problem. When well-intentioned residents are disparaged as ‘paid actors’ for a ‘Jewish money conspiracy scheme,’ there is a problem.”

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

A man walks along a street at Jose Felix Ribas neighborhood in Caracas, Venezuela January 30, 2019
May 22, 2019
Israeli group distributing relief to Venezuelan refugees in Colombia