Analysis: The Gulf War - 20 years on

How did a series of dramatic events drastically change Iraq’s domestic, regional and international relations?

By
January 21, 2011 16:32
3 minute read.
AN IRAQI-AMERICAN soldier pins deposed Iraqi leade

Saddam 311. (photo credit: Courtesy)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

The First Gulf War changed the very dynamic of relations between a superpower and a regional country – and changed the balance of power in the region as a whole.

Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait in 1990 created reactions that were unexpected by Baghdad: Sanctions and all-out war were unleashed by the US, along with a coalition of 30 countries, including Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Syria.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.



The sanctions – which lasted until the demise of the Ba’ath regime in 2003 – seriously weakened Iraq’s economy, and with it, the edifice of the regime.

The war set into motion the Kurdish and Shi’ite uprisings, which broke out immediately following fighting between the coalition forces and the Iraqi army.

The importance of these uprisings were that they proved the population had overcome their fear of Saddam Hussein, served as a rehearsal for the deep political transformations in post- Saddam Iraq and brought about deeper American involvement in Iraqi affairs. (This point was illustrated by the establishment of two no-fly zones for the Iraqi air force, in the Kurdish north and the Shi’ite south.) American involvement culminated in the 2003 war, which ended with the collapse of the Ba’ath regime – creating the most revolutionary changes ever to occur in Iraq.

For the first time since the advent of Islam there 1,400 years earlier, the Shi’ites became rulers of the state.

The Sunnis, who had a monopoly on power for hundreds of years, were ousted.

JPOST VIDEOS THAT MIGHT INTEREST YOU:


The centralist state system was altered into a federative arrangement, with the Kurdish region developing into a quasi-state of its own. At the same time, the Kurds became kingmakers in Baghdad.

The government system also underwent a dramatic change from a dictatorship to a budding democracy.

BUT THE abrupt shift imposed on the society had its price in the Arab part of Iraq. Indeed, years of upheavals, civil strife between Sunnis and Shi’ites, ongoing acts of terror by al-Qaida and disenfranchised Sunni Islamist groups and severe destruction of the infrastructure occurred.

Meanwhile, the Kurdish region flourished in an unprecedented manner.

The upheavals in the foreign arena are no less dramatic: The two Gulf Wars were an unprecedented event in the history of the region, particularly in Iraq.

After World War I, no outside power occupied a country in the Middle East, or remained in it, for nearly a decade – almost like the British mandate in the early years of the Iraqi state.

Paradoxically, the American presence in Iraq reduced the US’s deterrence – as exemplified by the Iranian challenges to both the Americans and the region as a whole.

Iraq’s own external posture also underwent a revolution: From a state which constituted a permanent threat to its neighbors by launching wars, it became threatened by war. All its neighbors are trying to fill the vacuum, or influence the Iraqi agenda.

The most worrying development from the region’s point of view was Iran’s deep penetration into Iraq – and the fact that Baghdad no longer constituted a balance to Teheran.

Additionally, the Arab world has long shied away from Baghdad because it was being headed by the Shi’ite-Kurdish coalition. Being enmeshed with its own domestic problems, Iraq has failed to develop a clear independent foreign policy of its own.

Regarding Israel, many people here welcomed the collapse of the Ba’ath state, whose demise removed a potential threat. However, ultimately the impact of this development was not positive: The changing strategic map turned Iran into the hegemon without Iraq to balance it.

Furthermore, Iran’s deep penetration in Iraq – together with the alliance with Syria and strong support for Hizbullah – have proved to be a more severe challenge than the weakened Ba’ath regime in its final years.

In the end, the two Gulf Wars forever altered the Iraqi state, the strategic map of the region and the involvement of the US in Iraqi affairs, which was almost nonexistent before.

The writer is a Dayan Center senior fellow and a lecturer at the Department of Middle Eastern History of Tel Aviv University.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Supreme Court President Asher Grunis
August 28, 2014
Grapevine: September significance

By GREER FAY CASHMAN