Background: Democracy and Talibanization in Pakistan

Wrangling between Musharraf, Bhutto, Sharif and Chaudhary only strengthens the Taliban.

November 10, 2007 21:30
2 minute read.
Background: Democracy and Talibanization in Pakistan

Bhutto 224.88. (photo credit: AP)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


The following is an analysis written last month Since the imposition of emergency rule on November 3, the word of the day in Pakistan and around the world is democracy, democracy, democracy, when the emphasis should be on security, as Pakistan descends into chaos largely caused by increasing Talibanization. While international attention focuses on the manhandling of protesting lawyers, jailed Supreme Court justices and fickle politicians, the Taliban and other Islamists expand their influence, sowing misery and fear. Across Pakistan's tribal belt, music stores and barbershops have closed and attacks against men without beards and unaccompanied women have increased. In one area, Islamists have warned women that their marriages will be annulled unless their husbands grow beards. These tensions are paralyzing Pakistan and undermining its ability to contend with Baitullah Mehsud, the unofficial emir of South Waziristan, and with Maulana Fazlullah, the acting leader of Tehreek-e-Nafaz-e-Shariat-e-Mohammadi (the Movement for the Enforcement of Islamic Laws), which President Gen. Pervez Musharraf banned in 2002. These two men have led a campaign against the Pakistani army, killing and capturing hundreds of soldiers and undermining the military's morale. Moreover, their military successes have divided the army, with some officers demanding action against the two Islamists and others calling for an Islamic Pakistan in the tradition of former Pakistani president Gen. Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq. Evaluating Musharraf's agenda is difficult for those in the West because of a natural distaste for military regimes coupled with a fundamental belief that military leaders are untrustworthy. Musharraf has not helped his cause by refusing to take off his uniform. By remaining evasive on his status as a general, Musharraf prevents a closer examination of the agendas of his major political opponents: former premiers Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif, who claim that democracy will only return to Pakistan with them at the helm. Consequently, the international media interviewing Bhutto, Sharif and their supporters gloss over their respective failures as prime ministers: under Bhutto the Taliban rose to power in Afghanistan, while under Sharif, Pakistan successfully tested five nuclear devices, leading to the imposition of limited US sanctions on the country. Even more important, nothing is mentioned of the corruption allegations hovering over Bhutto's head, or of Sharif's dalliance with Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal, an Islamist alliance. There is no doubt that Pakistan needs democracy. However, the wrangling between Musharraf, Bhutto, Sharif and former Supreme Court president Iftikhar Chaudhary only strengthens the Taliban and other Islamists who are using the political vacuum to takeover sections of the countryside. This has become apparent in the Swat Valley, a formerly tranquil tourist destination where followers of Fazlullah recently captured the towns of Madayan, Matta and Kwazakhela. Ultimately, if things continue along this path, the issues of democracy and democratization will become moot, as only one system and one voice is permitted under the Taliban: Islam and the mullahs. Dr. Isaac Kfir lectures on international relations at the Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

April 26, 2019
Empire cast members call for Jussie Smollett to return for next season