Florida jurors hung on alleged terror funding case

By ASSOCIATED PRESS
December 6, 2005 04:09
1 minute read.

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Jurors in the terrorism conspiracy trial of a former University of South Florida professor and three associates have reached full verdicts on two of the defendants, but remain deadlocked on some charges leveled against the other two men. The deadlock came as the jury had been deliberating for a 12th day Monday, trying to decide if Sami Al-Arian, a 47-year-old computer engineering professor, and three others raised money and conspired to support the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Prosecutors allege that Al-Arian and co-defendants Sameeh Hammoudeh, Ghassan Zayed Ballut and Hatem Naji Fariz used an academic think tank, a Palestinian charity and school founded by Al-Arian in Tampa as fund-raising fronts for the Islamic Jihad. The 51-count indictment includes charges of operating a criminal enterprise, conspiracy to murder and maim people outside the United States, money-laundering, and providing material support to a terrorist group. The four men argued that while they were vocal advocates for the Palestinian cause, they are innocent of the charges and that the money they raised and sent to the Palestinian territories was for legitimate charities.

Related Content

Which party makes the most use of the parliamentary tools available (August 14, 2018).
August 14, 2018
Which party's MK's are most active in Knesset?

By JPOST.COM STAFF