House approves $70 billion more for US war effort

Funds approved as part of $555 billion catchall spending bill that combines war money with money for 14 Cabinet departments.

By
December 20, 2007 06:20
3 minute read.
bush giving speech

bush 224.88 ap. (photo credit: AP)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

Congress approved $70 billion Wednesday for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, a bitter finish for majority Democrats who tried to force a change in President George W. Bush's war policy. The House of Representatives' 272-142 vote also sent the president a $555 billion catchall spending bill that combines the war money with money for 14 Cabinet departments. Bush and his Senate Republican allies forced the Iraq money upon anti-war Democrats as the price for letting the year-end budget deal pass and be signed. Other Democrats were eager to avoid being seen as not supporting troops who are in harm's way, which likewise would avoid weeks of bashing by Bush for failing to provide the money. "This is a blank check," complained Democratic Rep. Jim McGovern. "The new money in this bill represents one cave-in too many. It is an endorsement of George Bush's policy of endless war." McGovern is a leading dove among the Democrats, who took majorities away from Republicans in both chambers of Congress last year by promising to end the war. Bush has maneuvered the Democrats adroitly on Iraq and other subjects dear to Democratic voters, such as extending health insurance for poor children and providing help to family planning groups abroad that approve abortion. His weapon has been a unique Senate rule that requires 60 of the 100 senators to overturn a presidential veto; the Democrats' Senate majority is 51-49, including two independents who normally but not always vote with the Democrats. Wednesday's vote reflected the reluctance by each party to deny money to troops in the field. At the same time, anti-war Democrats had found their position weakened by the decline in violence in Iraq. War spending aside, Bush's Republican allies were divided over whether the overall spending bill was a victory for their party in the monthslong fight with Democrats over agency budgets. Conservatives and outside groups such as the Club for Growth, which seeks to elect lawmakers opposed to tax and spending increases, criticized the bill for having about $28 billion in domestic spending that topped Bush's budget and was paid for by a combination of "emergency" spending, transfers from the defense budget and other maneuvers. Republican leaders acknowledged some excesses. But they said the measure could have cost a lot more if their party and the White House had not stood firm against more than $20 billion in additional domestic spending included in Democratic spending bills that passed last summer. "The fact is we got the number down to the baseline," said House Republican leader John Boehner. Boehner supported moves that effectively broke Bush's budget cap to provide record budget increases for veterans and to build a fence and provide additional security along the US-Mexico border. While disappointed on the Iraq money, Democrats said the spending bill smoothed the rough edges of the president's February budget plan. That proposal had sought below-inflation increases for most domestic programs and contained numerous cuts and program eliminations. For Democrats, just finishing the budget ended up as the driving goal. They wanted to avoid the humiliation of failing to enact the spending bills after criticizing then-majority Republicans for not doing so last year. The spending legislation affects virtually every part of the government other than the Defense Department's core programs. It would pay for food and toy safety inspections, NASA, the FBI, the Coast Guard, education, health research and national park operations. It also contains about 9,000 pet projects sought by lawmakers, at a cost of more than $7 billion, according to Taxpayers for Common Sense, a Washington-based group that opposes such projects. The bill would raise the pay of federal civilian workers by 3.5 percent, extend farm subsidies the food stamp welfare coupon program for the poor until March 15 and eliminated money for a next-generation nuclear warhead. It also would keep banks from entering the real estate business. On its side, the Bush administration successfully used veto threats to rid the bill of more contentious items such as ending a ban on US aid to overseas family planning groups that perform or advocate abortions and easing financing of agricultural and medical sales to Cuba.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Stutthof concentration camp, Poland
December 15, 2018
Trial postponed for former Stutthof Nazi SS guard due to health concerns

By MARCY OSTER/JTA