'NY Times': Palestinian statehood vote is 'damaging'

Editorial suggests new roadmap drafted by US can “induce Palestinians to drop their statehood bid.”

August 8, 2011 08:29
2 minute read.
United Nations Security Council chamber

United Nations Security Council chamber 311. (photo credit: Patrick Gruban/WikiCommons)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


The New York Times published an editorial on Sunday criticizing the expected vote on Palestinian statehood at the United Nations in September, saying its “consequences could be profoundly damaging for all involved.”

The paper of note whose editorials are considered to carry considerable weight in international affairs expressed sympathy with the Palestinians' frustration over stalled talks with Israel but said a showdown at the UN would not help advance their cause.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

J'lem tells envoy to Honduras to remain at home
Erekat: PA statehood bid helps preserve peace process
MKs told nobody knows what September will bring

Such a confrontation would only further isolate Israel and the United States –which is likely to veto a motion on Palestinian statehood at the Security Council- and may have stark consequences for the Palestinians themselves, it said.

“After the initial exhilaration, Palestinians would be even more alienated, while extremists would try to exploit that disaffection,” it stated.

The daily said all sides shared the blame for the impasse that has existed ever since talks broke down in September 2010. According to the editorial, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was guilty of pandering to right-wing elements in his government and finding “excuses” to ignore dealing while the Palestinians who in turn were criticized for “giving up on diplomacy.”

It argued only direct talks between Israel and the Palestinians could effectively revive the peace process.  The best way of achieving such an outcome, it said, was for Washington to present a new outline for talks between the two with the backing of the international community.


“To have any chance of inducing the Palestinians to drop their statehood bid — and finally move the peace process forward — the United States and its partners should put a map and a deal on the table, with a timeline for concluding negotiations and a formal UN statehood vote,” it stated. “The Security Council and the Arab League need to throw their full weight behind it.”

Click for full Jpost coverage

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Yitzhak Rabin
September 22, 2018
The Olso Agreement was assassinated with Rabin