Iran nuclear offer falls short

Teheran formally sets out terms for giving up most of its enriched uranium.

February 24, 2010 07:44
2 minute read.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

mahmoud ahmadinejad yalla yalla 311. (photo credit: AP)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

VIENNA — Iran has formally set out its terms for giving up most of its cache of enriched uranium in a confidential document seen by the Associated Press on Tuesday, and the conditions fall short of what has been demanded by the United States and other world powers.

The document said Teheran is ready to hand over the bulk of its stockpile, as called for under a deal brokered by the International Atomic Energy Agency and endorsed by the five permanent UN Security Council members and Germany.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

But Iran added that it must simultaneously receive fuel rods for its research reactor in return, and that such an exchange must be on Iranian territory.

The letter — which appeared to formalize a position that Iranian officials have expressed to the IAEA and the media — was sure to be rejected by the six powers.

The US and its allies have previously said that there can be no significant deviation from the original draft deal, which would commit Iran to shipping out the material first and then wait up to a year for it to be turned into fuel for the reactor, which makes medical isotopes.

The letter — addressed to International Atomic Energy Agency chief Yukiya Amano — said Iran is "still seeking to purchase the required fuel in cash." However, it was unclear how Iran would do that because there are no stockpiles of fuel specifically made for its reactor.

Iran said it was ready to exchange its low-enriched uranium for the fuel rods "simultaneously in one package or several packages in the territory of the Islamic Republic of Iran," the letter says.

World powers have insisted that Iran ship out most of its enriched uranium first, then wait for it to be turned into the fuel rods because that would delay Iran's ability to make a nuclear weapon by leaving it with too little material to make a warhead.

But amid continued Iranian rejection of the deal, that potential constraint on Teheran's weapon-making capabilities is being eroded.

When the agreement was drawn up nearly six months ago, it foresaw Iran exporting about 1.2 tons of low-enriched material for further enrichment in Russia to near 20 percent and then reprocessing in France into fuel rods. Back then, that would have been about 70 percent of the Iranian stockpile.

But Iran has continued to enrich since, and now has about 2 tons of low-enriched uranium. That means that even if it now agreed to ship the requisite 1.2 tons, it would still be left with about 800 kilograms (1,765 pounds) — about two-thirds of what it would need to enrich further to weapons grade.

Because Iran continues to enrich in defiance of the UN Security Council — Teheran has said it has a right to do that to make nuclear fuel — it would thus be able to replenish its stock to what it would need to make a warhead much more quickly than half a year ago.

A senior Western official said Tuesday that — because of the time elapsed — Iran's letter appears to reject the deal the six world powers originally offered because it would no longer strip Teheran of its bomb-making ability for any length of time. He requested anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly on the issue.

Related Content

Bushehr nuclear Iranian
August 5, 2014
Iran and the bomb: The future of negotiations