Edelstein: Even Meretz wouldn’t agree to Palestinians' extreme demands

Knesset Speaker Yuli Edelstein is interviewed by ‘Jerusalem Post’ political correspondent Gil Hoffman at the newspaper’s Election Arena.

March 9, 2015 23:29
2 minute read.

JPost election arena: interview with Yuli Edelstein

JPost election arena: interview with Yuli Edelstein


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Knesset Speaker Yuli Edelstein explained why Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu believes his support for a Palestinian state is currently irrelevant, in an interview with The Jerusalem Post’s Election Arena.

Edelstein said the current Palestinian leadership is not about to give up its maximalist demands on territory and refugees.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

Nevertheless, officials in US President Barack Obama’s administration have been quoted saying they intend to renew efforts to reach an agreement between Israel and the Palestinians after the March 17 election.

“Netanyahu understands that statements he made about supporting a two-state solution are irrelevant because of the situation in the region and the Palestinian position,” he said. “It’s nice to play ping pong with ourselves. The only situation can be to manage the conflict so there will be as little terrorism as possible and to offer cooperation on water resources, agriculture and environment.”

Edelstein said he does not believe that after the election the Israeli prime minister will be challenged to set permanent borders.

“Right now you can talk about one state, two states, 15 states, it doesn’t take you anywhere,” Edelstein said.

“Even if [Meretz leader] Zehava Gal- On becomes prime minister, she wouldn’t sign a permanent agreement with the Palestinians, because right now their leader would not be able to sell any agreement with Israel that would make any concessions.

Right now, for them it’s about having it all. There would be no compromise.”

Edelstein said he has no doubt that President Reuven Rivlin would task Netanyahu with forming the next government, which he said he hoped would not include The Zionist Union. He criticized the prospect of a national unity government.

“The two parties have basically opposite views,” he said. “I have difficulty seeing how the two parties, which have such different basic points of view, can operate together, not just to survive but for the good of the country. I’m afraid a unity government would lead to a dead end very quickly.”

Edelstein was among several Israeli and international public figures whom Netanyahu tried to persuade to challenge Rivlin for the presidency, because of personal animosity between Rivlin and Netanyahu.

Channel 2 reported that in the event of a tight finish between the Likud and The Zionist Union, Rivlin would push for a unity government.

Asked whether, in light of that report, Edelstein regrets rejecting Netanyahu’s offer to run for president, he said he does not even consider giving up the Knesset speaker job, after not much more than a year on the job.

“I respect Rivlin, but the decision is with the voters,” he said. “If the Likud will be strong enough and big enough to form a national coalition, this will be the government.

But his behavior is natural for a president who symbolizes unity. When there is a clear cut victory of one side, no one talks about a national unity government.”

Related Content

Gideon Sa'ar
March 24, 2015
Sa'ar says national unity government is 'still on the table'