Deputy A-G to Regev: Your threatening cultural institutions harms free speech

The deputy attorney-general said that these harmful effects caused by Regev’s actions shake “the very foundations of free speech.”

May 14, 2017 19:01
1 minute read.
Culture Minister Miri Regev

Culture Minister Miri Regev. (photo credit: REUTERS)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The accumulation of threats by Culture and Sport Minister Miri Regev against cultural institutions that present themes she ideologically opposes harms free speech, Deputy Attorney-General for Legislative Affairs Dena Zilber recently told the minister.

It is unclear exactly when Zilber rebuked Regev’s policy of criticizing various left-leaning cultural institutions or the municipalities that fund them, but the Association for Civil Rights in Israel made the exchange public on Sunday.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

ACRI had submitted material to Zilber of Regev’s activities and requested her office’s intervention.

Zilber overwhelmingly confirmed ACRI’s complaints, saying that Regev’s activities against cultural institutions she disagrees with “formulated a worrying trend of incidents sending the problematic message that the activities of cultural institutions and artists are constantly under the watchful eye of the state,” and that the ruling coalition could at any time cut off the faucet of their funding for expressing the “wrong” ideology.

The deputy attorney-general said that these harmful effects caused by Regev’s actions shake “the very foundations of free speech.”

ACRI lawyer Dan Yakir responded to Zilber’s exchange with Regev, stating, “We hope that the deputy attorney-general’s directive will bring an end to the attempts by the minister [Regev] to harm free speech.”

Regev did not give ground to Zilber or ACRI, saying the deputy attorney-general “should be the first to know that cultural institutions, like any other institution in a proper functioning state, are not allowed to violate the law.”

She implied that any of her actions under criticism was a response to complaints she had received against institutions for thematically attacking the IDF or symbols of the state.

In contrast, Zilber had pointed out that the law does not restrict funding or allow penalizing cultural institutions for criticism of the IDF or the state’s symbols. It only allows such punitive actions for thematic attacks that are so destructive that they try to negate the existence of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state.

Zilber also said that only the finance minister can exercise such punitive authority, not Regev.

Related Content

August 17, 2018
Netanyahu interrogated for four hours in Case 4000 media bribery probe