Likud on comptroller report: Peres was worse

Report finds former president's expenditures to be 20 times greater than Netanyahu's.

February 17, 2015 16:04
3 minute read.
Yuval Steinitz

Yuval Steinitz. (photo credit: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM/THE JERUSALEM POST)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

State Comptroller Joseph Shapira’s report on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s expenditures is part of an effort by the media to remove him from power, Netanyahu charged Tuesday in a meeting with Likud loyalists.

Netanyahu and his wife, Sara, had convened the ministers and MKs closest to him, along with his lawyer David Shimron and former police commander Ya’acov Barovsky, to plan strategy ahead of the report’s release. They decided at the meeting to downplay the report, blame disgruntled former housekeeper Meni Naftali, and try to direct attention to expenditures by former president Shimon Peres at the President’s Residence.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

“The report is exaggerated,” said Likud minister Yuval Steinitz, the politician closest to Netanyahu. “Such a fuss should not be made out of it.”

Steinitz said that in 2012, Peres’s household expenditures were 20 times as much as Netanyahu’s.

He questioned why the report needed to be published a month before the election, when expenses in the Prime Minister’s Residence were never checked under any of Netanyahu’s predecessors.

“Perhaps the comptroller gave in to pressure from the media,” Steinitz suggested.

Steinitz expressed confidence that Attorney- General Yehuda Weinstein would not decide to accept Shapira’s recommendation to open an investigation into money received from deposits on soft drink bottles or into how patio furniture was purchased.

He said the Netanyahus had no knowledge of an incident in the report in which an electrician was summoned to their home in Caesarea on Yom Kippur. Steinitz said the Netanyahus always spend Yom Kippur in Jerusalem.

The Likud released an official statement saying that Netanyahu respects the findings released in the comptroller’s report. The statement said that large portions of the recommendations in the report were implemented prior to its release and that Netanyahu had issued a directive to implement the remaining recommendations in the best and most effective manner possible.

“To our sincere regret, the ongoing media campaign which has surrounded this issue for weeks in advance of the report’s release was a clear effort to remove the prime minister from office and the Likud from leadership through a focus on irrelevant minutia and distract from the real issue at hand: Who will defend the State of Israel in the face of the real security threats and pressure from the international community – Netanyahu or [his opponents]?” the Likud statement said.

The Likud said that among the items that were investigated in the comptroller’s report there were absolutely no indications of any assault on the public’s integrity nor of any criminal transgressions. The party said the report’s introduction “includes reference to inconsequential matters regarding the recycling of bottles and patio furniture” and said such issues were not investigated by the comptroller.

“Neither the prime minister nor the Prime Minister’s Office received any official request for clarification pertaining to these matters,” the statement said. “Therefore, no opportunity was afforded to offer an official response.”

The Likud complained that the report did not offer any comparisons to other official residences in Israel, such as the President’s Residence. It noted that the expenses of the Prime Minister’s Residence had been reduced significantly over the past two years and were reduced significantly following Naftali’s departure from his former position.

“The expenses significantly increased during a specific period of time when the house’s maintenance and operation were directed by Mr. Meni Naftali – an embittered former public employee,” the Likud said. “Naftali is currently leading a campaign of slander and defamation against the prime minister with the specific goal of illegitimately leveraging his claim for financial gain from the state coffers and to damage the prime minister and the Likud Party during this period of Knesset elections.”

Naftali called a press conference in which he said he was hurt by the Likud’s accusations.

His lawyers said Netanyahu should be ashamed for blaming Naftali for his own problems.

Related Content

Hebrew Ben-Yehuda
July 21, 2018
Paper artist brings historical Jerusalem figures to life