Jerusalem Municipality must provide equal pay to women, rules Labor Court

According to the court, the women worked in the same office along with two other women and two men who all completed the same tasks.

By
January 3, 2017 04:39
1 minute read.
The District Court of Jerusalem.

The District Court of Jerusalem. . (photo credit: JERUSALEM MUNICIPALITY)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The National Labor Court on Monday issued a ruling that requires the Jerusalem Municipality to pay two female employees the same as their male counterparts.

Galit Keidar and Daphna Ilouz claimed that during their employment in the municipality’s sanitation department they received less pay than males doing the same job.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


According to the court, the women worked in the same office along with two other women and two men who all completed the same tasks.

The men were considered part of the “garage and transport workers” at the municipality and received additional salary supplements, while the women were considered “management division employees” and as such, received significantly lower salary supplements than their male counterparts.

Keidar and Ilouz initially sued the municipality in a regional court to equalize their pay and benefits to that of their male colleagues, in accordance with the Equal Pay Act of 1996, as well as to receive compensation for gender discrimination under the Equal Employment Opportunities Law of 1988.

The regional court rejected their claim, and as such, the women filed an appeal with the National Labor Court.

The National Court in turn ruled in favor of the two appellants, and ruled that they were entitled to a full comparison of wages, similar to those of their male counterparts.



The court noted in its decision that the Equal Pay Act was “designed to combat head-on the reality where wage gaps between women and men are continuing, widespread, consistent and meaningful.”

The decision further clarified that the mere distribution into groups of female and male workers within the same department “clearly reflects that structural discrimination that the Equal Payment Act was designed to eradicate.”

In addition, the court ruled that the appellants were in fact discriminated against because of their gender and were entitled to compensation from the municipality for damages caused to them as a result – some NIS 75,000.

The municipality was also ordered to pay the court costs of the appeal proceedings totaling some NIS 25,000 per appellant.

Related Content

July 16, 2018
How much did Israelis spend on hotels in Russia during the World Cup?

By TAMARA ZIEVE