NGO asks High Court to think twice about legality of Deri as minister

Movement for the Quality of Government in Israel claims court panel invented a new more lenient legal precedent for convicted public servant’s to return to being ministers.

August 27, 2015 19:07
1 minute read.
Arey Deri



Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

An NGO requested a rare appeal to a broader panel of the High Court of Justice about the legality of Arye Deri being economy minister following an August 13 ruling of a standard three-justice panel that his appointment was borderline unreasonable, but legal.

Deri was forced to resign in 1993 amid a corruption investigation, after five years as interior minister. In 2000, he was convicted of bribery, fraud and violation of trust, and he was sentenced to three years in prison. He was released in 2002 after serving 22 months.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

He also waited more than the seven-year cooling off period for returning to politics and was not reinstated as Shas party leader until 2012.

The NGO, the Movement for the Quality of Government in Israel, wrote in its request that the three-justice panel had invented a new, more lenient legal precedent for convicted public servant’s to return to being ministers and had improperly thrown out the prior limits.

The movement said that in the past there were 12 factors to be considered regarding convicted officials returning to become a cabinet minister and that the High Court had virtually ignored all of them other than the time that had elapsed since Deri’s offense.

The court had noted that even as Deri was released from prison in 2002, the actual offenses took place nearly 30 year before.

In contrast, the NGO said that the court did not give proper weight to the severity of the offenses, with Deri’s crime of bribery being the worst of the public corruption crimes, and the specific need for the individual, Deri, in the ministerial spot.

While the earlier High Court panel questioned the reasonableness of Deri’s appointment, it also emphasized the prime minister’s discretion: “In light of all of the considerations we examined... and in light of the prime minister’s broad discretion in such matters, we did not find grounds to intervene.”

Appeals to a broader High Court panel are rare, are even more rarely granted, and it is extremely seldom that a broader panel reverses the decision of a smaller panel.

Related Content

August 17, 2018
Netanyahu interrogated for four hours in Case 4000 media bribery probe