Report shows spike in valid complaints against judges

A valid complaint indicates that the judge made one of a variety of possible errors.

March 23, 2016 20:34
1 minute read.

Gavel [Illustrative]. (photo credit: INIMAGE)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The Ombudsman for Complaints Against Judges, retired Supreme Court justice Eliezer Rivlin, on Tuesday presented his 2015 annual report, which noted a leap from 11 percent to 18% in valid complaints against judges.

Rivlin presented the report to Supreme Court President Miriam Naor and Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

Naor’s predecessor, Asher D. Grunis, had been criticized for failing to remove from the bench judges found unfit in previous annual reports. The Ombudsman for Complaints Against Judges Law was enacted in 2002.

This year’s report said that in 2015, 824 complaints were filed, a jump from 2014, but still less than the record of 930 in 2013. Of these 824 complaints, 96 were determined to be valid, down from the peak of 101 cases in 2013.

Thirty-five percent of the valid complaints related to delays in court proceedings, while 23% related to case management.

In 2015, Naor gave a severe warning to one judge and a severe censure to another because of valid complaints.

The report cited as an example of judicial misconduct the case where a judge told a lawyer, “I have a suggestion for you. Do not get into bed with this sick person.”

Ombudsman Rivlin wrote that judges should not advise lawyers whom they should represent, and that the dirty language used by the judge was inappropriate.

In another example, a judge told a sexual harassment complainant that she did not view her claim as valid, since “It takes two to tango,” and since the employee had “used her sexuality in order to obtain” goals in her office. There was also a complaint that some of the judge’s more colorful language was left out of the court transcript.

The report highlighted problems in the small claims and rabbinical courts, including a failure by the latter to appoint enough judges, resulting in an extensive backlog of cases.

Related Content

Tony Kishman’s Beatles tribute band.
August 19, 2018
The Beatles, with strings attached