Supreme Court presses Haifa U. to lighten up on protests

The petition was filed against a change made to Haifa University’s bylaws around four years ago which allowed the university president to ban public demonstrations on campus for an indefinite period.

March 9, 2015 21:43
1 minute read.

A young girl looks down over the city of Haifa.. (photo credit: REUTERS)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The Supreme Court on Monday pressed the University of Haifa to alter its strict policy regarding campus protests after an appeal was filed against the university by the Association for Civil Rights in Israel.

In response, the university said it would present a new draft policy to the court and to ACRI within 60 days, giving it enough time to undergo necessary internal processes with the university senate.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

ACRI filed the appeal against a change made to the University of Haifa’s bylaws about four years ago that allowed the university president – in consultation with other senior university officials – to ban public demonstrations on campus for an indefinite period. More specifically, ACRI complained about the university’s ban on protests during the 2008-9 Gaza War, the 2010 Mavi Marmara flotilla, the 2012 Gaza War and other events.

The university said the bans were not indefinite, and were mainly designed to protect public order and secure the academic space for studies during periods of high tension.

It also claimed that other universities have similar powers to limit or ban protests in exceptional situations and that the University of Haifa, with its mixed Jewish-Arab character, faces unique risks of outbreaks of disorder.

The three-justice panel of Esther Hayut, Hanan Melcer and Neal Hendel heavily criticized the university, saying that no other academic institution had blanket power to ban protests for an indefinite period, with some limiting bans to a maximum of 30 days. The justices also said no other university had left its power to temporarily ban protests so broad – with the others limiting it to extreme circumstances – and none banned protests without explaining the justification.

Hayut said the court wanted a new draft policy since “it is clear that this language [of the current policy] raises difficulties.”

She added that “limiting free speech is supposed to be done carefully and not in sweeping strokes.”

ACRI lawyer Sharona Eliyahu- Hai stated: “We have noticed a clear trend in recent years of restricting the free speech of University of Haifa students, especially attempts to silence minority opinions on campus. Freedom of speech is a basic component of the democratic system, and universities do not have power over the actualization of that freedom.”

Related Content

August 15, 2018
Deja vu: Will the Flug farce be repeated?