Supreme Rabbinical Court poised to re-open agunah case

The case relates to a 34-year old woman whose husband was involved in a motorcycle accident nine years ago and sustained severe injuries. He fell into a coma and has not recovered since.

November 19, 2016 20:20
2 minute read.

Divorce. (photo credit: ING IMAGE/ASAP)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


In an unprecedented step, the Supreme Rabbinical Court is weighing whether or not to allow a third party appeal against a divorce ruling that could lead to the revocation of a woman’s divorce from her husband who has been in a coma for the last nine years.

Director of the Rabbinical Courts Network Rabbi Shimon Yaakobi told The Jerusalem Post on Thursday that the Supreme Rabbinical Court would hold a hearing in the coming weeks on whether or not a third party who has appealed the divorce, who has no connection to the wife or the husband, has legitimate standing to do so.

If the court agrees, it will then hold a hearing on the case itself.

The 34-year-old woman’s husband was severely injured in a motorcycle accident nine years ago and has been in a coma ever since.

Jewish law stipulates that a man must freely give his wife a bill of divorce (a get) for the marriage to be formally terminated, but since an unconscious person is unable to do so this situation leaves his wife “chained” to the marriage.

In the summer of 2014, three rabbinical judges of the Safed Rabbinical Court, in consultation with the man’s doctors, ruled that there was no serious likelihood that he would ever awaken from his coma.

They then used an innovative interpretation of Jewish law concluding that they could issue a get zikui – a bill of divorce that is granted on the husband’s behalf - which he would agree to and desire to give if he could.

According to the interpretation used by the rabbinical judges, it is a positive Torah commandment to end a marriage if the husband is no longer able to fulfill his marital obligations, and he would therefore want to issue the divorce if this were the case, allowing the rabbinical judges to enact this wish.

The Safed ruling was issued by court president Rabbi Uriel Lavi, Rabbi Yosef Yagoda and Rabbi Haim Bazak, who noted in the ruling that they had based their decision on the halachic opinions and writings of two of the most authoritative rabbis of the last century: Rabbi Avraham Yeshaya Karelitz, known as the Hazon Ish, and Rabbi Tzvi Pesach Frank However, their decision was opposed by leading haredi rabbis, including Rabbi Aharon Leib Shteinman, the most senior non-hassidic rabbi in the haredi world, Rabbi Haim Kanievsky, and Chief Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef.

Mavoi Satum, a divorce rights organization that represented the woman in her original case, was strongly critical of the decision to possibly re-open the case, and said it would appeal the decision to the Supreme Court.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Culture Minister Miri Regev
March 24, 2019
Regev defends PM against accusations of racism