Israel, US disagree on post-Assad Syria

Israel: A future regime in Syria, should Assad lose power, might be just as problematic as the old one.

By NATHAN GUTTMAN
December 4, 2005 02:06
3 minute read.
bashar assad looking regal 298

bashar assad 298 88 ap. (photo credit: AP)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Israel and the US are at odds over the future of Syria in a post-Bashar Assad era, The Jerusalem Post has learned. In a strategic dialogue held last week in Washington between the two countries, Israeli representatives warned that a future regime in Syria, should Assad lose power, might be just as problematic as the old one. The Israelis projected three possible scenarios if the current regime does fall - all of them dangerous for the stability of the region. The first was the possibility that Syria would deteriorate into total chaos and plunge into some sort of civil war; the second was that Assad would be succeeded by another member of the ruling Alawite sect who would be a hardliner like Assad; or, third, that an extreme Islamic regime would take over the country. Sources briefed on the content of the talks said these Israeli warnings stood in stark contrast to the American view as it was presented in the dialogue. The Americans said they believed that, after Assad, Syria would go through an evolutionary process similar to the one Lebanon has experienced in the past year, and would transform into a free political society. This optimistic scenario is based on the positive experience in Lebanon and the significant pro-reform forces already active in Syria. The fact that Israeli and American officials were discussing "day after" scenarios for Syria does not indicate that the US has a plan for regime change in Syria, however. According to the sources, the conversation was part of a joint attempt by Israel and the US to map out the long-term goals of both countries in the region and discuss future possibilities. The two sides also discussed the wider issue of democratization in the Arab world and, here too, the Israelis said they were not as optimistic as the Americans regarding the prospects of promoting democratic reforms in the region. The Israeli delegation was headed by Minister Tzahi Hanegbi and the US group was led by Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Nicholas Burns. While the sides differed in their views concerning the future of Syria, there was agreement on the current situation in the country. The Israeli participants pointed out that it was important for Israel to know that the fact that Syria is allowing insurgents and terrorists to enter Iraq and fights American soldiers was not the only issue the US administration has with Bashar Assad's regime. Israel sees Syrian support of Hizbullah as a significant threat and also would like to see Assad close the offices of Palestinian terror groups operating from Damascus. The American delegation assured the Israelis that the Iraqi border was just one of the issues that the US would like to deal with and that Assad was expected to act on a variety of issues, including closing the Iraqi border, ending support to terror organizations and ceasing all involvement in neighboring Lebanon.

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town

By SHARON UDASIN