Livni, Ramon defend realignment plan

Poll indicates 49% of public opposed to plan, 38% in favor, 17% unsure.

By
July 11, 2006 22:14
2 minute read.
Livni, Ramon defend realignment plan

livni sits 298.88. (photo credit: Ariel Jerozolimski)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni and Justice Minister Haim Ramon came to the defense of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's realignment plan Thursday, a day after three other Kadima ministers questioned its relevance in light of the recent events in Gaza. Livni, speaking at a Reut Institute Conference in Herzliya, said that she did not think that the "last few days have changed everything." "I don't see in the last month a reason to retreat from my overriding goal," Livni said, defining that goal as a two-state solution that would ensure Israel remain a Jewish and democratic state. She said that the recent events had not convinced her that Israel was better off with a "stagnant" status quo, although she said the country needed to push forward a process that did take into consideration "what is happening on the other side." Livni said that a debate on realignment was premature, since the details of the plan had not been spelled out. She said that her ministry was mapping out what Israel's strategic, demographic and religious/historical interests were, which it would want to preserve regardless of whether Israel took unilateral steps in the West Bank or sat down to negotiate an agreement with the Palestinians. Ramon, speaking at a Council for Peace and Security meeting said that he did not "see in the foreseeable future any better alternative to realignment." He said that as a result of disengagement, there had been a dramatic change in Israel's international position that had allowed it to take very harsh measures in Gaza against terrorism. Both Ramon and Livni were responding to comments made Monday by Construction and Housing Minister Meir Sheetrit, Immigrant and Absorption Minister Ze'ev Boim and Environment Minister Gideon Ezra, who raised questions about the plan. "The chances right now of implementing realignment are very small. There are many reservations, including my own," Sheetrit said. "I don't believe in another unilateral withdrawal. What is going on in Gaza reinforces the opposition to realignment." As the debate about realignment continued inside Kadima, a poll released Tuesday indicated that 49 percent of the public was opposed to realignment, while only 38% were in favor. Another 13% had no opinion. The survey, carried out by telephone last Wednesday and Thursday among 500 people, was commissioned by the Reut Institute for a conference Tuesday entitled "Between Disengagement and Realignment." The poll was carried out by Smith Research and Consulting and had a 4.5% margin of error. Asked if they supported or opposed the realignment plan in which Israel would withdraw unilaterally from settlements in Judea and Samaria, evacuate 70,000 settlers from their homes, but preserve Israeli sovereignty over the settlement blocs in Ariel and Gush Etzion, 49% of the respondents said they were either moderately or strongly opposed to the plan, while 38% said they were moderately or strongly in favor. Religious affiliation was a strong indicator of sentiment. While 54% of those who defined themselves as "secular" said they supported the plan, 56% of those calling themselves "traditional" opposed it, as did 78% of those who labeled themselves "religious." As to whether they thought the plan would be carried out over the next two years, 36% said they felt the chances of it being carried out during this time frame were small or non-existent, while 22% said they thought the chances were good or very good. Seventeen percent of the respondents had no opinion. Livni dismissed the findings of these types of polls on realignment, asking how could people answer a question about realignment when the details of the plan had not been determined or presented.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town

By SHARON UDASIN